1988 PLP 1293 (MLD)
| Citation | 1988 PLP 1293 (MLD) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi |
| Bench Members | Saeeduzzaman Siddiqui, J |
| Parties | |
| Primary Law | Succession Act (XXXIX of 1925)‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1988 PLP 1293 (MLD)?
This judgment primarily cites: Succession Act (XXXIX of 1925)‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1988 PLP 1293 (MLD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: Saeeduzzaman Siddiqui, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1988 PLP 1293 (MLD) (). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Fauq H.Naek for Petitioner.
- G. Raymond for Respondent.
- Date of hearing: 28th February, 1988.
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑‑Ss.278 & 372‑‑Letters of administration, grant of‑‑Petitioner daughter of deceased applying for issue of letters of administration in respect of property of deceased who left behind a Will which, on demand had been filed in Court along the other documents‑‑According to Will son of deceased was to be appointed as executor of Will‑‑Contents of Will accepted as correct by all concerned‑‑Petitioner stated that he had no objection in case said son of deceased was appointed as administrator of property‑‑Son of the deceased at first agreed to said suggestion of petitioner but later on withdrew his claim in favour of petitioner, he being not in a position to furnish required security and stated that petitioner be appointed as administrator of property and simultaneously a probate be issued in his favour‑‑Petitioner agreeing, Court passed a consent order accordingly.
Judgment & Decree
The petitioner has applied for grant of letters of administration in respect of the property which originally belonged to Joseph Montero son of Montero who died at Karachi on 23‑6‑1967. This property on the demise of Joseph Montero devolved on his wife Mrs. Julie Montero and two sons Sebastain Montero and William Montero and two daughters Mrs. Patricia de Souza and Mrs. Myrtle Lobo. Mrs. Julie Montero also died on 4‑9‑1976 and on her demise her share also devolved on the two sons and 2 daughters of Joseph Montero which is already mentioned above. Out of the two sons of the deceased Joseph Montero, Sebastain Montero died on 22‑6‑
86. It is stated in paragraph 10 of the petition that the deceased Sebastain Montero at the time of his death left behind a Will which is in possession of William Montero but the said will has neither been disclosed nor its contents were communicated to the petitioner. ?he petition is supported by Patricia de Souza the other sister of the petitioner while it was initially opposed by next of kin No.4 William Montero. It is however, not disputed that upon the death of Joseph Montero and his wife Julie Montero the property devolved in equal share on the two sons and two daughters of the deceased. The objection raised by next of kin No.4, however, was that as no probate of the Will executed by Sebastain Montero has been granted by the Court his estate is unrepresented in the proceedings and accordingly no letters of administration can be issued in this case. On 6‑12‑87 after hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.G. Raymond for William Montero I directed Mr.G. Raymond to place on record a copy of the Will alongwith original documents in Court on 20th December 1987. Accordingly, the original Will was produced and from reading the same it was established that late Sebastain Montero appointed William Montero as the executor of his Will and has bequathed his own share in the property in favour of William Montero. Upon residing of the above Will a direction was issued to the petitioner and other heirs to file affidavit to the effect that whether they accepted the Will as correct or not. The petitioner then filed an affidavit dated 6‑2‑1979 in which she accepted the correctness of the contents of the Will by Sebastain Montero in favour of William Montero and prayed that he has no objection if William Montero is appointed as the executor of the Will. Learned counsel for the petitioner also agreed at the hearing of this petition that in case William Montero has any objection to the appointment of the petitioner as the administrator of the property the letters of administration may be issued in his favour alongwith a probate of the Will of late Sebastain Montero. Learned counsel for William Montero at the first instance agreed to the above suggestion of the learned counsel for the petitioner but later on withdrew his claim and stated that his client is not in a position to furnish the security required for issuance of letters of administration and accordingly prayed that the petitioner may be appointed as administrator of the deceased but simultaneously a probate be issued m favour of William Montero in respect of the Will proved m Court as having been executed by Sebastain Montero. Learned counsel for the petitioner did not oppose the above request and accordingly by consent. of the parties I pass the following order. (1) That William Montero is granted probate of the Will dated 24‑3‑1986 executed by the late Sebastain Montero in his favour and such Probate may be issued in favour of William Montero on execution of personal bond. (2) That as a result of the appointment of William Montero as the executor of the Will of late Sebastain Montero the estate of deceased Sebastain Montero is now fully represented and as there is no objection to the issuance of the letters of administration in favour of the petitioner the same is granted. Letters of administration may be issued to the petitioner on execution of personal bond with one surety equal to the value of the property of the deceased. M.Y.H./M‑478/K Order accordingly.