SCMR 1988

1988 PLP 871 (SCMR)

KHALID HUSSAIN SHAH and another‑‑Petitioners Versus SUBA and others‑‑Respondents

Jurisdiction / Court
High Court
Decided Date
Petition for Leave to Appeal No.162 of 1983, decided on 20th February, 1988.
Honorable Judges
Aslam Riaz Hussain, Muhammad Afzal Zullah and Javid Iqbal, JJ
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1988 PLP 871 (SCMR)
Forum / Court High Court
Bench Members Aslam Riaz Hussain, Muhammad Afzal Zullah and Javid Iqbal, JJ
Parties KHALID HUSSAIN SHAH and another‑‑Petitioners Versus SUBA and others‑‑Respondents
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1988 PLP 871 (SCMR)?

This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1988 PLP 871 (SCMR)?

The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Aslam Riaz Hussain, Muhammad Afzal Zullah and Javid Iqbal, JJ.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1988 PLP 871 (SCMR) (KHALID HUSSAIN SHAH and another‑‑Petitioners Versus SUBA and others‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Representation

  • Syed Inayat Hussain, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioners.
  • Nemo for Respondents Nos.1 to 3.
  • Date of hearing: 20th February, 1988.
  • Khawaja Shaukat Ali, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Ejaz Ahmad Khan, Advocate‑on‑Record for the State.

Headnotes / Summary

(On appeal from the judgment and order of the Lahore High Court, Lahore, dated 28th May, 1983 in Criminal Appeal No.510 of 1980/Murder Reference No.141 of 1980). Penal Code (XLV of 1860)‑ ‑‑‑S.302/34‑‑Leave to appeal‑‑Evidence‑‑Trial Court convicting and sentencing accused to death but High Court acquitting them‑‑Contention that there was no justification on part of High Court in rejecting evidence proving guilt of accused, particularly in presence of testimony of approver corroborated by recoveries made from house of accused of deceased's belongings as well as evidence of his extra‑judicial confession‑‑Leave to appeal granted to consider whether grounds of rejection of evidence against accused were proper and in accordance with accepted principles of safe administration of criminal justice. Khawaja Shaukat Ali, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Ejaz Ahmad Khan, Advocate‑on‑Record for the State.

Judgment & Decree

JAVID IQBAL, J.‑‑This petition for leave to appeal is directed against the acquittal of respondents Suba Khan, Khalid Mahmood and Muhammad Siddiq. Learned counsel submits that respondents Khalid Mahmood and Muhammad Siddiq have since died. Therefore, their names be deleted from the list of respondents. Their names are accordingly deleted. This leaves only Suba Khan respondent in the field. Briefly the facts are that all the three respondents were tried under section 302/34, P.P.C. for the murder of Akhtar Hussain Shah and the trial Court convicted them under the aforesaid sections sentencing each of them to death plus fine. On appeal the Lahore High Court set aside their conviction and sentence and acquitted them. The dead body of the deceased was found hanging with a rope by the ceiling of an uninhabited house in the village. There is no eye‑witness of the occurrence and the case of the prosecution is based on circumstantial evidence. The death was caused due to asphyxia and shock caused by dislocation of cervical vertebra. The hands were tied with a rope in front, and the doctor had opined that it was homicidal strangulation. The deceased was last seer, in the company of the respondents by Manzoor Ahmad P.W.9 on the fateful night On 19th April, 1979 Muhammad Nazir P.W.12 and Muhammad Aslam P.W.13 produced before the Police Suba Khan respondent and others as each of them had made separate extra‑judicial confessions before them of the murder of the deceased. Thereafter, on 25th April, 1979 at the pointing out of Suba Khan respondent were recovered from his 'house shirt, shalwar, wrist watch (with name of the deceased in Urdu carved on its back) and ring belonging to the deceased. Then on 5th May, 1979 the fourth companion of the respondents namely Altaf Hussain Shah appeared before the police and voluntarily narrated all about the occurrence. He was subsequently tendered pardon and thus became an approver. It was submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that there was no justification on the part of the Lahore High Court, Lahore in rejecting the evidence proving the guilt of Suba Khan respondent particularly when there was the testimony of the approver corroborated by the recoveries made from the house of Suba Khan respondent of the belongings of the deceased as well as evidence of his extra‑judicial confession. We grant leave in this case to consider as to whether the grounds of rejecting of evidence against Suba Khan respondent were proper and in accordance with the accepted principles of safe administration of criminal justice. Non‑bailable warrants to be issued against Suba Khan respondent. S.Q./K‑43/S Leave granted.