1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))
BASHIR AHMAD CH. Versus SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB, GA.I.D.
| Citation | 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) |
| Forum / Court | Supreme Court of Pakistan |
| Bench Members | Abdul Shakurul Salam, Rustam S. Sidhwa and Muhammad Afzal Lone, JJ |
| Parties | BASHIR AHMAD CH. Versus SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB, GA.I.D. |
| Primary Law | (b) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), (a) Constitution of Pakistan (1973) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?
This judgment primarily cites: (b) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), (a) Constitution of Pakistan (1973) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?
The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Court of Pakistan bench comprising: Abdul Shakurul Salam, Rustam S. Sidhwa and Muhammad Afzal Lone, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) (BASHIR AHMAD CH. Versus SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB, GA.I.D.). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Muhammad Zaman Qureshi, Advocate Supreme Court and Ch. Qamaruddin Khan Meo, Advocate-on-Record for Appellant.
- Rana Muhammad Bashir, Advocate Supreme Court and Mian Ataur Rehman, Advocate-on-Record for Respondent No.3.
- Date of hearing: 3rd July, 1991.
Headnotes / Summary
(From the judgment of the Punjab Service Tribunal, Lahore, dated 15-1-1984, passed in Appeal No.583/118 of 1982).
Art.212(3)
Compulsory retirement of employee of Urban Transport Corporation
Employee claiming to be employee of Provincial Government which claim was rejected by the Service Tribunal
Leave to appeal was granted to consider as to whether such employee could be treated as one on deputation, in view of decision of Supreme Court in Fayyaz Ali Khan's case reported as 1971 SCMR
454. Fayyaz Ali Khan v. Government of West Pakistan 1971 SCMR 454 rel.
Art.212(3)
Employee of Urban Transport Corporation claiming status of Government employee
Service Tribunal while rejecting employee's appeal had not dealt with the matter in some depth
Employee's appeal was remanded in the interest of justice for decision afresh as to whether the employee was a civil servant or not after taking into consideration fresh documents that might be produced by the parties. Ch. Rafiq Ahmad Shad v. Chairman, Punjab Road Transport Board 1977 PLC (C.S.T.) 110 and Punjab Road Transport Board v. Punjab Service Tribunal 1982 SCMR 76 ref. Respondents Nos.l and 2: Ex-parte.
Judgment & Decree
(a) Constitution of Pakistan (1973)
Art.212(3)
Compulsory retirement of employee of Urban Transport Corporation
Employee claiming to be employee of Provincial Government which claim was rejected by the Service Tribunal
Leave to appeal was granted to consider as to whether such employee could be treated as one on deputation, in view of decision of Supreme Court in Fayyaz Ali Khan's case reported as 1971 SCMR
454. Fayyaz Ali Khan v. Government of West Pakistan 1971 SCMR 454 rel. (b) Constitution of Pakistan (1973)
Art.212(3)
Employee of Urban Transport Corporation claiming status of Government employee
Service Tribunal while rejecting employee's appeal had not dealt with the matter in some depth
Employee's appeal was remanded in the interest of justice for decision afresh as to whether the employee was a civil servant or not after taking into consideration fresh documents that might be produced by the parties. Ch. Rafiq Ahmad Shad v. Chairman, Punjab Road Transport Board 1977 PLC (C.S.T.) 110 and Punjab Road Transport Board v. Punjab Service Tribunal 1982 SCMR 76 ref. Muhammad Zaman Qureshi, Advocate Supreme Court and Ch. Qamaruddin Khan Meo, Advocate-on-Record for Appellant. Respondents Nos.l and 2: Ex-parte. Rana Muhammad Bashir, Advocate Supreme Court and Mian Ataur Rehman, Advocate-on-Record for Respondent No.3. Date of hearing: 3rd July, 1991.