1994 P Cr (PLP)
TAHIR HUSSAIN and another — Petitioners Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 1994 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | TAHIR HUSSAIN and another — Petitioners Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1994 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1994 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1994 P Cr (PLP) (TAHIR HUSSAIN and another — Petitioners Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Altaf Ibrahim Qureshi for Petitioners.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 498
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.337-A/452/427
Sessions Court after having granted bail before arrest to accused had dismissed their bail application because of their absence
Accused had pleaded their engagement on official duties, as the cause of their absence in the Sessions Court
High Court, in circumstances, directed the accused to appear before the Sessions Court for decision of their bail application on merits, granting them interim relief of pre-arrest bail.
Judgment & Decree
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 1257/B of 1993, decided on 18th September, 1993.
S. 498
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.337-A/452/427
Sessions Court after having granted bail before arrest to accused had dismissed their bail application because of their absence
Accused had pleaded their engagement on official duties, as the cause of their absence in the Sessions Court
High Court, in circumstances, directed the accused to appear before the Sessions Court for decision of their bail application on merits, granting them interim relief of pre-arrest bail. Altaf Ibrahim Qureshi for Petitioners. The learned Additional Sessions Judge, Sahiwal had, on 9-9-1993, dismissed the bail application of the petitioners because of their absence. They had earlier been granted bail before arrest, vide order, dated 7-8-1993. Tahir Hussain claims to be a constable and states that he could not, alongwith his younger brother, Sabir Hussain co-accused, appear in the Court, as on 8-9-1993, the I.-G., Police was on visit to Police Recruits Training Centre at Farooq Abad, and he (Tapir Hussain) was not relieved till noon time on the next day i.e. 9-9-1993.
2. The petitioners are directed to appear on 25-9-1993 before the same learned Additional Sessions Judge, who shall dispose of the petition on merits. However, the petitioners shall not be arrested on each one of them furnishing bail bond in the sum of Rs.10,000 with one surety each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the A.C./Duty Magistrate, Sahiwal. A copy of the order may be given to the petitioners Dasti and another shall be conveyed to the Court concerned. The petition need not to be kept pending and stands finally disposed of. N.H.Q./T-91/L Order accordingly.