2008 P Cr (PLP)
HAIDER ABBAS alias MUNNA BHAI and another — Applicants Versus THE STATE and 2 others — Respondents
| Citation | 2008 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | HAIDER ABBAS alias MUNNA BHAI and another — Applicants Versus THE STATE and 2 others — Respondents |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2008 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2008 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2008 P Cr (PLP) (HAIDER ABBAS alias MUNNA BHAI and another — Applicants Versus THE STATE and 2 others — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Mustafa Lakhani for Respondents Nos.2 and 3.
Headnotes / Summary
Ss. 435 & 439
Revision petition had been filed against interim order while main proceedings were still pending
Counsel for the parties agreed that impugned order could: be set aside and District and Sessions Judge could be directed that matter be transferred to any Additional Sessions Judge who should dispose of the matter expeditiously
Suggestion being reasonable, revision petition was disposed of accordingly by the High Court.
Judgment & Decree
MUNIB AHMED KHAN, J.
Mr. Mustafa Lakhani filed power on behalf of the respondents Nos.2 and 3, which is taken on record and submits that the respondents are the owners of the subject plot involved in this proceeding and they are suffering seriously. He further submits that this revision application has been filed against the interim order of the Additional Sessions Judge, Karachi East, while main proceedings are still pending. On the other hand Mr. Javaid Alam submits that the interim order is almost final order for the purposes of applicant, as direction has been issued to the Nazir to take the possession of the property. After arguing to some extent the learned counsel agreed that the order, dated 30-5-2007 may be set aside and learned District and Sessions judge, Karachi East, may be directed that the matter may be transferred to any other Additional Sessions Judge, who should dispose of the matter expeditiously and possibly within a period of two months. The suggestion is reasonable and accepted and this criminal revision application is disposed of accordingly with above directions. H.B.T./H-22/K Order accordingly.