1988 PLP 1866 (SCMR)
GHULAM ABBAS and 9 others — Petitioners Versus MUHAMMAD AFZAL and 7 others — Respondents
| Citation | 1988 PLP 1866 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Afzal Zullah and Abdul Kadir Shaikh, JJ |
| Parties | GHULAM ABBAS and 9 others — Petitioners Versus MUHAMMAD AFZAL and 7 others — Respondents |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1988 PLP 1866 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1988 PLP 1866 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Muhammad Afzal Zullah and Abdul Kadir Shaikh, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1988 PLP 1866 (SCMR) (GHULAM ABBAS and 9 others — Petitioners Versus MUHAMMAD AFZAL and 7 others — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Malik Abdus Sattar Chughtai, Advocate Supreme Court and Syed Abul Aasim Jaffari, Advocate-on-Record (absent) for Petitioners.
- Nemo for Respondents.
- Date of hearing: 20th June, 1988.
- Malik Abdus Sattar Chughtai, Advocate Supreme Court and Syed Abul Aasim Jaffari, Advocate‑on‑Record (absent) for Petitioners.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the judgment and order of the Lahore High Court, Lahore dated 16-5-1988 passed in R.S.A. No.50 of 1981).
Art.185(3)--Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), S.100--Leave to appeal, grant of-- Concurrent findings of fact--interference with- Respondents' suit for possession through redemption of suit property on payment of mortgage debt--Petitioners claiming that transaction was sale and not mortgage--Suit decreed and decision upheld in Regular Second Appeal--High Court having satisfactorily dealt with all material points and nothing found to justify interference with concurrent findings of fact, leave to appeal refused. Ansar Ali and others v. Muhammad Ismail and others 1968 S C M R 302 ref.
Judgment & Decree
MUHAMMAD AFZAL ZULLAH, J.‑‑Leave to appeal has been sought from judgment of the Lahore High Court, Lahore whereby petitioners' Regular Second Appeal in a property dispute case was dismissed. Respondents side's suit for possession through redemption of the suit shop on payment of the mortgage debt, was decreed. The petitioners' plea was that transaction was of sale and not of mortgage, though in order to overcome certain difficulties due to the character of the property, it was given the colour of mortgage. It has been rejected by all the three Courts below. Learned counsel contended that the tests laid down by this Court regarding determination of the character of the transaction stood satisfied in petitioners' favour‑‑reference was made to Ansar Ali and others v. Muhammad Ismail and others 1968 S C M R
302. He has also relied on various circumstances and material on record with a view to show that the transaction was sale. Similar arguments were raised before the High Court. The case cited before us was also relied upon. But they did not find favour with the learned Judge in the High Court, who satisfactorily dealt with all substantial points. We also heard the learned counsel at some length to see if any principle has been violated in reaching the concurrent findings of fact, which go against the petitioner. But nothing has been found to justify interference by this Court‑‑not even the judgment of this Court relied upon by the learned counsel. Leave to appeal is, therefore, refused. M.I./G‑123/S Petition dismissed.