PLC(CS) 1992

1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))

Mst. NASRIN FAIZ and others Versus AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR

Jurisdiction / Court
Azad J&K High Court
Decided Date
Writ Petitions Nos. 34, 39, 44, 52 and 53 of 1990, decided on 18th June, 1991,
Honorable Judges
Khawaja Muhammad Saeed J
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))
Forum / Court Azad J&K High Court
Bench Members Khawaja Muhammad Saeed J
Parties Mst. NASRIN FAIZ and others Versus AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR
Primary Law (b) Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VIII of 1974), (c) Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VIII of 1974), (a) Civil service
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?

This judgment primarily cites: (b) Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VIII of 1974), (c) Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VIII of 1974), (a) Civil service as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?

The case was heard and decided by the Azad J&K High Court bench comprising: Khawaja Muhammad Saeed J.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) (Mst. NASRIN FAIZ and others Versus AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

(b) Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VIII of 1974) (c) Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VIII of 1974) (a) Civil service

Representation

  • Muhammad Akram Khan, G.M. Mughal, deputising for M.H. Gilani and Rafique Mahmood Khan for Petitioners.
  • Addl. A.-G., Sher Zaman Awan, Muhammad Hanif Khan, Muhammad Yunus Tahir for Respondents.

Headnotes / Summary

Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VIII of 1974), S. 44-- Constitutional petition

Application to be impleaded as a proforma defendant in Constitutional petition

No definite relief had been sought for through such application

Application wherein, no definite prayer had been made, deserved no consideration and same was to be dismissed.

Ss. 44 & 47

Azad Jammu and Kashmir Service Tribunal Act, 1975, Ss. 2(b) & 4

Azad Jammu and Kashmir Civil Servants Act, 1976, S. 9

Constitutional jurisdiction vested in the High Court under S. 44, Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act, 1974, stood ousted in matters relating to terms and conditions of service of civil servants, pursuant to S. 47(1.), Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act, 1974 where under Service Tribunal had been established to adjudicate in matters relating to terms and conditions of service of civil servants

Ouster of jurisdiction with regard to matters relating to terms and conditions of services of civil servants, was thus, absolute and unqualified

Civil servants' case, as per averments in their constitutional petitions, exclusively fell within jurisdiction of Service Tribunal

Civil servants' plea, that they having been promoted were subsequently reverted, was triable exclusively through appeal, before Service Tribunal

Constitutional petition relating to terms and conditions of service of civil servants being not maintainable, was dismissed. Muhammad Azhar v. General Manager (Operation), Power, WAPDA, Lahore PLD 1990 Lah. 352. ref. PLD 1980 AJ&K (SC) 5 rel.

S. 44

Constitutional petition

Maintainability

Civil servants challenging their reversion after promotion, which they availed for some time

Civil servants not impleading those persons who had been appointed to the posts previously retained by them

Such persons being necessary party, no order could be passed in discretionary jurisdiction at their back without impleading them

Constitutional petition was not maintainable from such angle as well, when considered. Raja Sher Muhammad Khan for Mst. Bushra Mahmooda Khatoon.

Judgment & Decree

Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VIII of 1974), S. 44-- Constitutional petition

Application to be impleaded as a proforma defendant in Constitutional petition

No definite relief had been sought for through such application

Application wherein, no definite prayer had been made, deserved no consideration and same was to be dismissed. (b) Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VIII of 1974)

Ss. 44 & 47

Azad Jammu and Kashmir Service Tribunal Act, 1975, Ss. 2(b) & 4

Azad Jammu and Kashmir Civil Servants Act, 1976, S. 9

Constitutional jurisdiction vested in the High Court under S. 44, Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act, 1974, stood ousted in matters relating to terms and conditions of service of civil servants, pursuant to S. 47(1.), Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act, 1974 where under Service Tribunal had been established to adjudicate in matters relating to terms and conditions of service of civil servants

Ouster of jurisdiction with regard to matters relating to terms and conditions of services of civil servants, was thus, absolute and unqualified

Civil servants' case, as per averments in their constitutional petitions, exclusively fell within jurisdiction of Service Tribunal

Civil servants' plea, that they having been promoted were subsequently reverted, was triable exclusively through appeal, before Service Tribunal

Constitutional petition relating to terms and conditions of service of civil servants being not maintainable, was dismissed. Muhammad Azhar v. General Manager (Operation), Power, WAPDA, Lahore PLD 1990 Lah. 352. ref. PLD 1980 AJ&K (SC) 5 rel. (c) Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VIII of 1974)

S. 44

Constitutional petition

Maintainability

Civil servants challenging their reversion after promotion, which they availed for some time

Civil servants not impleading those persons who had been appointed to the posts previously retained by them

Such persons being necessary party, no order could be passed in discretionary jurisdiction at their back without impleading them

Constitutional petition was not maintainable from such angle as well, when considered. Muhammad Akram Khan, G.M. Mughal, deputising for M.H. Gilani and Rafique Mahmood Khan for Petitioners. Addl. A.-G., Sher Zaman Awan, Muhammad Hanif Khan, Muhammad Yunus Tahir for Respondents. Raja Sher Muhammad Khan for Mst. Bushra Mahmooda Khatoon.