1968 PLP 1402 (SCMR)
ANJUMAN‑I‑INTEZAMIA COMMITTEE, JAMIA MASJID AHLE‑HADEES, LYALLPUR AND ANOTHER‑Petitioners Versus THE STATE AND ANOTHER‑Respondents
| Citation | 1968 PLP 1402 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | ANJUMAN‑I‑INTEZAMIA COMMITTEE, JAMIA MASJID AHLE‑HADEES, LYALLPUR AND ANOTHER‑Petitioners Versus THE STATE AND ANOTHER‑Respondents |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1968 PLP 1402 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1968 PLP 1402 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1968 PLP 1402 (SCMR) (ANJUMAN‑I‑INTEZAMIA COMMITTEE, JAMIA MASJID AHLE‑HADEES, LYALLPUR AND ANOTHER‑Petitioners Versus THE STATE AND ANOTHER‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Maqbool Ahmad Bata and Kh. Shaukat Ali, Advocates Supreme Court instructed by Ch. Khalilur Rehman, Attorney for Petitioners.
- M. B. Zaman, Senior Advocate Supreme Court (Bashir Zafar, Advocate Supreme Court with him) instructed by Fazal‑i‑Hussain, Attorney for Respondent No. 2.
- Date of hearing : 25th June 1968.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the judgment and order of the High Court of West Pakistan, Lahore, dated the 15th January 1968, in Criminal Revision No. 1223 of 1967).
S. 145‑Whether no proceeding under section can be taken in respect of a mosque Special Leave to Appeal granted by Supreme Court to consider question. Nemo for the State. ORDER FAZLE‑AKBAR, C. J.‑It was contended inter alia that the learned Single Judge of the High Court erred in holding that no proceedings under section 145 of the Criminal Procedure Code can be taken with respect to a mosque. As the question raised is of general public importance, we grant leave to appeal to consider the above as well as the other points raised in this petition. Security‑Rs. 1000. Prayer for stay is refused. Leave granted.
Judgment & Decree
FAZLE‑AKBAR, C. J.‑It was contended inter alia that the learned Single Judge of the High Court erred in holding that no proceedings under section 145 of the Criminal Procedure Code can be taken with respect to a mosque. As the question raised is of general public importance, we grant leave to appeal to consider the above as well as the other points raised in this petition. Security‑Rs. 1000. Prayer for stay is refused. Leave granted.