P L D 1970 Lahore 137 (PLP)
DR. FAIZ ALI SHAH‑Petitioner Versus (1) PROVINCE OF WEST PAKISTAN, THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF WEST PAKISTAN, LAHORE,
| Citation | P L D 1970 Lahore 137 (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | West Pakistan (Gazetted) Civil Services (Pay Revision) Rules, 1964, Sched., Part I, Item No. 7 as amended by Notification No. FD‑PC (III‑Gaz.‑17/64‑1074/64, dated 25‑9‑1964 ‑Officer of West Pakistan Health Services Class I, posted as Section Officer in Secretariat‑‑Entitled to non‑practising allowance of Rs. 200 p.m. in addition to Secretariat pay permissible under Rules‑Executive order cannot override Rules framed by Governor particularly when Rules are later in point of time‑Order reducing non practising allowance to Rs. 100 p.m. in circumstances, held, without lawful authority. |
| Bench Members | Mushtaq Hussain and Shameem Hussain Kadri, JJ |
| Parties | DR. FAIZ ALI SHAH‑Petitioner Versus (1) PROVINCE OF WEST PAKISTAN, THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF WEST PAKISTAN, LAHORE, |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in P L D 1970 Lahore 137 (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case P L D 1970 Lahore 137 (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the West Pakistan (Gazetted) Civil Services (Pay Revision) Rules, 1964, Sched., Part I, Item No. 7 as amended by Notification No. FD‑PC (III‑Gaz.‑17/64‑1074/64, dated 25‑9‑1964 ‑Officer of West Pakistan Health Services Class I, posted as Section Officer in Secretariat‑‑Entitled to non‑practising allowance of Rs. 200 p.m. in addition to Secretariat pay permissible under Rules‑Executive order cannot override Rules framed by Governor particularly when Rules are later in point of time‑Order reducing non practising allowance to Rs. 100 p.m. in circumstances, held, without lawful authority. bench comprising: Mushtaq Hussain and Shameem Hussain Kadri, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: P L D 1970 Lahore 137 (PLP) (DR. FAIZ ALI SHAH‑Petitioner Versus (1) PROVINCE OF WEST PAKISTAN, THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF WEST PAKISTAN, LAHORE,). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- M. Ismail Bhatti for Appellant.
- Raja Said Akbar, A.‑G. West Pakistan with Anwar‑, Beg S. O., Finance Department for Respondents
- Date of hearing : 11th June 1969.
Headnotes / Summary
West Pakistan (Gazetted) Civil Services (Pay Revision) Rules, 1964, Sched., Part I, Item No. 7 [as amended by Notification No. FD‑PC (III‑Gaz.‑17/64‑1074/64, dated 25‑9‑1964] ‑Officer of West Pakistan Health Services Class I, posted as Section Officer in Secretariat‑‑Entitled to non‑practising allowance of Rs. 200 p.m. in addition to Secretariat pay permissible under Rules‑Executive order cannot override Rules framed by Governor particularly when Rules are later in point of time‑Order reducing non practising allowance to Rs. 100 p.m. in circumstances, held, without lawful authority.
Judgment & Decree
Health Services Technical Pay f Class, I Rs. 100 per mensem to medical graduates plug non‑practising allow ance Rs. 200 per mensem where private practice is not allowed." It is not denied that the aforesaid Rules are now in force as amended by this Notification. It is also not denied that the petitioner belongs to the West Pakistan Health Service Class, I. By virtue of this rule, therefore, he, being a Medical Graduate, is entitled to a non‑practising allowance of Rs. 200 per mensem since as a Section Officer in the Secretariat he is not allowed private practice. The impugned order of the Governor dated 25‑9‑1962 cannot override Rules framed by him particularly when they came later in point of time.
6. It was contended before us that the petitioner was also drawing a sum of Rs. 220 per month as Secretariat Pay and if he was also given a non‑practising allowance of Rs. 200 he would be getting Rs. 420 over and above his basic salary. This, to say the least, is no argument in support of the stand taken by the Government. It is common knowledge that Secretariat Pay is admissible to all persons belonging to non -Secretariat Service as and when they are posted to the Secretariat. If, for example, a member of the Provincial Service were to occupy the post of action Officer, of which the peti tioner is an incumbent at the moment, the P. C. S. Officer would be entitled to this Rs. 220 p.m. as Secretariat Pay. This is not denied by the Government. The amount of Rs.200 is allowed to members of the West Pakistan Health Service Class I as non‑practising allowance because they ari deprived of earning a much bigger amount by taking to pro fessional practice during their leisure hours. This allowance cannot be confused with the Secretariat Pay, referred to above, and has, in fact, no relevancy to the point which arises in this case for determination.
7. The conclusion that we have arrived at, therefore, is that the petitioner is entitled as a member of the West Pakistani Health Service Class I, to‑ (i) his basic salary admissible to him as a member of " the Health Service Class I ; (ii) Rs. 220 per month as Secretariat Pay also known as Special Pay; and (iii) to Rs. 200 per month as non‑practising allowance as 4 provided by Item No. 7 of Part I of the Schedule to the West Pakistan (Gazetted) Civil Services (Pay Revision) Rules, 1964, as amended by the Notification dated 25th September 1964, reproduced in extenso above.
8. The impugned order is declared to be without lawful authority. The impugned order is, in fact, no longer operative having been impliedly repealed by the amendment of the West Pakistan (Gazetted) Civil Services (Pay Revision) Rules. 1964 on 25th September 1964 whereby the petitioner by virtue of being, member of the West Pakistan Health Service Class I, became entitled to Rs. 200 as non‑practising allowance.
9. The Government shall now therefore take necessary steps to pay to the petitioner the aforesaid amount of Rs. 200 per month as non‑practising allowance from the date that it has not been paid to him.
10. The petition is accepted with costs. A. E. Petition accepted.