CLD 2006

2006 PLP 663 (CLD)

Show-Cause Notice No.SMD/Co.62/2/2004-S, 6th December, 2005

Jurisdiction / Court
Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan
Decided Date
2006-January-30
Honorable Judges
N/A
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 2006 PLP 663 (CLD)
Forum / Court Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan
Bench Members N/A
Parties Show-Cause Notice No.SMD/Co.62/2/2004-S, 6th December, 2005
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2006 PLP 663 (CLD)?

This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2006 PLP 663 (CLD)?

The case was heard and decided by the Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan bench comprising: N/A.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 2006 PLP 663 (CLD) (Show-Cause Notice No.SMD/Co.62/2/2004-S, 6th December, 2005). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Headnotes / Summary

S. 18-A

Making a fictitious application or submitting more than one application for shares of companies offered to the public

Effect

Bank on behalf of sponsoring share-holders of Bank (the offerer) vide a letter, furnished to Securities and Exchange Commission, a list of cases of all those applicants which were detected by the Corporation (the balloters of the offer) as being filed in violation of S.18-A of Securities and Exchange Ordinance, 1969

One application was submitted by applicant through one Commercial Bank and other allegedly was submitted by him through a different Bank

Both said applications were submitted under same name with same N.LC. number and father's name, but with different signatures and addresses

Show-cause notices were issued by Securities and Exchange Commission to one and same person, but on different addresses

Applicant in his reply to written explanation had stated that he had submitted only one application through one Commercial Bank and that he had no knowledge of person who had filed other application

Perusal of said applications and correspondence exchanged in the matter, had revealed that said application had been submitted by two different persons using same N.LC. number and father's name, but with different addresses and signatures

Facts made it evident that application submitted by applicant through Commercial Bank was genuine

Offerer was advised to accept application submitted by applicant through Commercial Bank and refund subscription money deposited against same and money deposited against fictitious application be confiscated accordingly.

Judgment & Decree

ARIF MIAN, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR (SECURITIES MARKET DIVISION).

The matter arises from the Show-Cause Notices No.SMD/Co.62/2/2004-5 dated December 6, 2005 issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan (the Commission) to (i) Mr. Aamir Shezad Awan son of Malik A Muhammad Maqbool, N.I.C. No.4230 1-0837283-1, address: Flat No.G-596, Gall No.1, Near Masjid-e-Hira, Manzoor Colony, Karachi (Applicant No 1) and (ii) Mr. Amir Shahzad Awan son of Malik Muhammad Maqbool NIC No.42301-0837283-1, address: J.M, 716/9/1, 101-A, Fatima Jinnah Colony, Karachi IA (Applicant No 2).

2. Facts of the case are that Bank Alfalah Ltd. (the Bank), on behalf of sponsoring shareholders of the Bank (the Offerer) vide letter dated June 7, 2004 furnished to the Commission a list of cases of all those applicants which were detected by Uni Corporate and Financial Services (Pvt.) Ltd. (the balloters to the offer) as being filed in violation of Section 18A of the Securities and Exchange Ordinance, 1969, which stipulates that:-- "(1) No person or any other person on his behalf shall make a fictitious application or submit more than one application for shares of companies offered to the public. (2) In case of contravention of the provisions of subsection (1), the application money shall be liable to confiscation." Mr. Aamir Shezad Awan's name appeared in the aforementioned list of multiple applicants. One application bearing No. 02-023-A-187 was submitted through Askari Commercial Bank Ltd., Jodia Bazar Branch Karachi and the other application bearing No.20-382-1303 was submitted through United Bank Limited, Kayani Shaheed Road Branch, Karachi. Both the applications were submitted under the same name with the same NIC number and fathers name but with different signatures.

3. The Commission called for a written explanation from applicant No 1 vide letter dated July 12, 2004 at the address mentioned in Application No.02-023-A-187 i.e. Flat No.G-596, Gall No.1, Near Masjid-e-Hira, Manzoor Colony, Karachi. He replied vide his letter dated nil stating that he had submitted only one application through Askari Commercial Bank Limited, Jodia Bazar Branch, Karachi and requested for allotment of shares.

4. The Commission then called for a written explanation from Applicant No 2 vide letter dated August 3, 2004 at the address mentioned in the application i.e. J.M 716/9/1, 101-A, Fatima Jinnah Colony, Karachi. He replied vide letter dated nil which was received on August 19, 2005 stating that he had submitted only one application and the other application was filed by Mrs. Riffat Zahid and that it could be that by mistake photocopy of his NIC was attached with both the applications.

5. In order to ascertain the factual position and to reach to a conclusion, the aforementioned show-cause notices were issued and subsequently a hearing was held on December 13, 2005 at the Companies Registration Office, Karachi. During the course of the hearing, Mr. Aamir Shezad Awan appeared in person stating that he submitted only one Application No.02-023-A-187 through Askari Commercial Bank Limited, Jodia Bazar Branch, Karachi using Account No. 2832-0 and that he has no knowledge of the person who filed the other application. He presented his original NIC and a letter from his Banker i.e. Askari Commercial Bank Limited, Jodia Bazar Branch, Karachi in support of his arguments. He requested the Commission for the refund of subscription money deposited against Application No. 02-023-A-187.

6. I have considered the arguments presented before me by the applicant. A perusal of the applications and correspondence exchanged in the matter reveals that these applications have been submitted by two different persons using the same NIC number and Father's Name but with different addresses and Signatures. From the facts presented before me, it is evident that Application No. 02-023-A-187 submitted by Mr. Aamir Shezad Awan through Askari Commercial Bank Ltd., Jodia Bazar Branch, Karachi is genuine, hence the Offerer is advised to accept Application No. 02-023-A-187 submitted by Mr. Aamir Shezad Awan and refund the subscription money deposited against the same.

7. The identity of applicant No.1 has been established as Mr. Aamir Shezad Awan appeared in person before me and since no one appeared before me in response to Show-Cause Notice No.SMD/Co.62/2/2004-S dated December 6, 2005, claiming Application No. 20-382-1303 also filed in the name of Mr. Amir Shehzad Awan bearing the address House No.J.M 716/9/1, 101-A, Fatima Jinnah Colony, Karachi, therefore, it is evident that Application No. 20-382-1303 is fictitious. Accordingly, the subscription money deposited against the said fictitious application be confiscated under subsection (2) of section 18-A of Securities and Exchange Ordinance, 1969. Bank Alfalah Limited is advised to deposit the subscription money to be confiscated against application No. 20-382-1303 in the designated bank account maintained in the name of Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan with Habib Bank Limited within thirty days from the receipt of this Order and furnish the receipted challans to the Commission.

8. Further, the State Bank of Pakistan (SBP) is requested to investigate the opening of Account No. 6774-3, in the name of Mr. Aamir Shehzad Awan in United Bank Ltd., Kayani Shaheed Road Branch, Karachi without conducting proper due diligence. Based on the findings of the investigation carried out, SBP is requested to take appropriate action against the concerned individuals/parties under intimation to this office. H.B.T./51/SEC??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? Order accordingly.