SCMR 1997

1997 PLP 1521 (SCMR)

MUHAMMAD NAWAZ‑‑‑Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD NAWAZ alias NAJI and 4 others‑‑‑Respondents

Jurisdiction / Court
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Decided Date
Criminal Petition for Leave to Appeal No.222‑L of 1996, decided on 23rd April, 1997.
Honorable Judges
Irshad Hasan Khan, Raja Afrasiab Khan and Khalil‑ur‑Rehman Khan, JJ
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1997 PLP 1521 (SCMR)
Forum / Court Supreme Court of Pakistan
Bench Members Irshad Hasan Khan, Raja Afrasiab Khan and Khalil‑ur‑Rehman Khan, JJ
Parties MUHAMMAD NAWAZ‑‑‑Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD NAWAZ alias NAJI and 4 others‑‑‑Respondents
Primary Law Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑‑
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1997 PLP 1521 (SCMR)?

This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1997 PLP 1521 (SCMR)?

The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Court of Pakistan bench comprising: Irshad Hasan Khan, Raja Afrasiab Khan and Khalil‑ur‑Rehman Khan, JJ.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1997 PLP 1521 (SCMR) (MUHAMMAD NAWAZ‑‑‑Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD NAWAZ alias NAJI and 4 others‑‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑‑

Representation

  • Syed Abul Aasim Jafri, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
  • Nemo for Respondents Nos. l to 4.
  • Date of hearing: 23rd April, 1997.
  • Ch. Muhammad Ibrahim, Advocate Supreme Court for the State.
  • 2. In compliance with the order of this Court dated 14‑7‑1996, notice of this petition was sent to the respondents as well as Advocate‑General, Punjab for a date to be fixed by the office. In pursuance of the notice, Muhammad Boota has appeared on behalf of his son, Muhammad Nawaz and also for the respondents Nos.2 to 4 to state that their learned counsel has gone to perform Hajj. Power of attorney was also filed by Mr. M.A. Qureshi, Advocate‑on -Record on 3rd of July 1996 to contest this petition. On call, neither the respondents Nos. l to 4 nor their learned counsel has appeared today.

Headnotes / Summary

(On appeal from the order of the Lahore High Court dated 5‑6‑1996 passed in Crl. Misc. 2/96 in Cr.A. 671 of 1994). ‑‑‑‑S. 426(1)‑‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.302/149 & 148‑‑‑Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.185(3)‑‑‑Suspension of sentence‑‑‑Accused respondents having been convicted and sentenced on the charge of murder, High Court had no justification in law to suspend their sentences‑‑‑Petition for leave to appeal was consequently converted into appeal and allowed and the order of High Court suspending the sentences of accused was recalled. Ch. Muhammad Ibrahim, Advocate Supreme Court for the State.

Judgment & Decree

RAJA AFRASIAB KHAN, J.‑‑‑On 9th of November, 1993 at 11‑00 a.m., a case under section 302/148/149, P.P.C. was registered on the statement of Muhammad Nawaz with Police Station Saddar, Jalalpur Jattan, District Gujrat Muhammad Nawaz, Muhammad Afzal, Sarwar, Ejaz Muhammad Younas and Javaid lqbal for the murder of Muhammad Riaz. An Additional Sessions Judge, Gujrat vide his judgment dated 12th of December, 1994 convicted the aforesaid accused holding that in execution of their common object, they launched an attack armed with deadly weapons and committed the aforesaid offences. Under section 148, P.P.C., he sentenced all the accused to two years' R.I. and fine of Rs.2,000 each or in default to undergo S.I. for three months. Javaid lqbal was sentenced to death plus compensation of Rs.15,000 or in default thereof to undergo S.I. for two years under section 302/ 149, P. P. C. , . The remaining five accused were sentenced to imprisonment for life plus compensation of Rs.5,000 each or in default thereof to further undergo S.I. for one year each. Benefit of section 382‑B, Cr.P.C. was extended to the accused except Javaid Iqbal. The convicts challenged their conviction and sentence through Appeal No.671 of 1994 which is pending adjudication before the Lahore High Court. Criminal Miscellaneous No.2 of 1996 was moved by the accused for suspension of their sentences. A Division Bench of the Lahore High Court vide its order, dated 5th of June, 1996 suspended the sentence of respondents Nos. l to 4 saying that no injury was attributed to them. They were alleged to have ineffectively fired during the incident. This petition for leave to appeal has been brought by the complainant, Muhammad Nawaz.

2. In compliance with the order of this Court dated 14‑7‑1996, notice of this petition was sent to the respondents as well as Advocate‑General, Punjab for a date to be fixed by the office. In pursuance of the notice, Muhammad Boota has appeared on behalf of his son, Muhammad Nawaz and also for the respondents Nos.2 to 4 to state that their learned counsel has gone to perform Hajj. Power of attorney was also filed by Mr. M.A. Qureshi, Advocate‑on -Record on 3rd of July 1996 to contest this petition. On call, neither the respondents Nos. l to 4 nor their learned counsel has appeared today.

3. We have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned l State Counsel. The respondents Nos.1 to 4, as pointed out above, were convicted and sentenced on the charge of murder. There was no justification in law with the High Court to suspend their sentences. The order dated 5th of June, 1996 suspending the sentences of the respondents is recalled by converting this petition into appeal and allowing it. Non‑bailable warrants of arrest shall be issued against the respondents Nos. l to 4 so that they may be lodged in Jail. However, in the interest of justice, Criminal Appeal No.671 of 1994 of the convicts shall be heard and decided as early as possible. N.H.Q./M‑5/S Appeal allowed.