1999SCMR2146 (PLP)
CORPORATION LTD. and others — Appellants Versus Dr. LATEEF SIDDIQUI and another — Respondents
| Citation | 1999SCMR2146 (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Supreme Court of Pakistan |
| Bench Members | Khalil-ur-Rehman Khan, Wajihuddin Ahmed and |
| Parties | CORPORATION LTD. and others — Appellants Versus Dr. LATEEF SIDDIQUI and another — Respondents |
| Primary Law | Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1999SCMR2146 (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1999SCMR2146 (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Court of Pakistan bench comprising: Khalil-ur-Rehman Khan, Wajihuddin Ahmed and.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1999SCMR2146 (PLP) (CORPORATION LTD. and others — Appellants Versus Dr. LATEEF SIDDIQUI and another — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Qamar Islam Abbasi, Advocate Supreme Court and K.A. Wahab, Advocate-on-Record for Appellant.
- Ali Ahmad Fazeel, Advocate Supreme Court and A.A. Siddiqui, Advocate-on-Record for Respondent NO. 1.
- Dates of hearing: 10th and 11th June, 1999.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 2-A
Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.185
Employee, of statutory Corporation
Parties agreed at the appeal stage before Supreme Court that matter might be referred to Service Tribunal to. be decided within a period of five months
Supreme Court, in view of agreement entered into between the parties, while setting aside the impugned judgment of High Court, observed that in view of S.2-A, Service Tribunals Act, 1973, employee could file appeal before Service Tribunal against the order of his dismissal from service alongwith an application for condonation of delay, which application be considered sympathetically and appeal be decided in accordance with law without being influenced from any finding or observation recorded in the impugned judgment of High Court with liberty to the parties to take all the pleas available to them under law.
Judgment & Decree
S. 2-A
Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.185
Employee, of statutory Corporation
Parties agreed at the appeal stage before Supreme Court that matter might be referred to Service Tribunal to. be decided within a period of five months
Supreme Court, in view of agreement entered into between the parties, while setting aside the impugned judgment of High Court, observed that in view of S.2-A, Service Tribunals Act, 1973, employee could file appeal before Service Tribunal against the order of his dismissal from service alongwith an application for condonation of delay, which application be considered sympathetically and appeal be decided in accordance with law without being influenced from any finding or observation recorded in the impugned judgment of High Court with liberty to the parties to take all the pleas available to them under law. Qamar Islam Abbasi, Advocate Supreme Court and K.A. Wahab, Advocate-on-Record for Appellant. Ali Ahmad Fazeel, Advocate Supreme Court and A.A. Siddiqui, Advocate-on-Record for Respondent NO.
1. Dates of hearing: 10th and 11th June, 1999. After arguing the matter at some length learned counsel for the parties has filed a joint statement which reads as under:-- "The parties agree that the matter may be referred to Service Tribunal to be decided within a period of five months." In view of the addition of section 2-A in Service Tribunals Act, 1973, the parties agreed that the respondents may file an appeal before Service Tribunal against the order of his dismissal from service alongwith an application for condonation of delay which application be considered sympathetically. The impugned judgment, in view of the agreed arrangements, is set aside. The Service appeal shall be decided in accordance with law without being influenced from any finding or observation recorded in the impugned judgment. The parties will be at liberty to take all the pleas available to them under, law. The appeal stands disposed of accordingly. No order as to costs. M.B.A./S-138/S Order accordingly.