1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))
Dr. MUNAWAR HUSSAIN Versus GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB through Chief Secretary, and another
| Citation | 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) |
| Forum / Court | Service Tribunal Punjab |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Mehmud Aslam Pirzada, |
| Parties | Dr. MUNAWAR HUSSAIN Versus GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB through Chief Secretary, and another |
| Primary Law | (b) Punjab Civil Servants Act (VIII of 1974), (a) Punjab Civil Servants Act (VIII of 1974) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?
This judgment primarily cites: (b) Punjab Civil Servants Act (VIII of 1974), (a) Punjab Civil Servants Act (VIII of 1974) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?
The case was heard and decided by the Service Tribunal Punjab bench comprising: Muhammad Mehmud Aslam Pirzada,.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) (Dr. MUNAWAR HUSSAIN Versus GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB through Chief Secretary, and another). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Ch. Mushtaq Masood for Appellant.
- A.G. Humayun, DA. for Respondents.
- Date of hearing: 2nd August, 1989.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 2(1)(a)
Punjab Civil Servants (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules, 1975-- Ad hoc appointee
Locus standi--Services of appellant an ex-Medical Officer on ad hoc appointment were terminated on account of misconduct
Appellant accepted offer of appointment fully knowing that his appointment was purely ad-hoc and subject to termination at any time without giving any notice and this ad-hoc appointment would not confer any right for regular appointment to same post
Appellant, thus, had no vested legal rights to continue in service once the Department had resorted to a fresh recruitment through prescribed method--An ad-hoc appointee, had no locus standi. 1982 SCMR 877 rel.
S. 2(1)(a)
Ad-hoc appointment not made in accordance with prescribed manner was liable to be terminated immediately on availability of recommendee of Public Service Commission
When appellant accepted ad hoc appointment which was only a stopgap arrangement, respondent employer, held, was under no legal obligation to regularise his service. Muhammad Siddique Ch.'s case PLD 1974 SC 393 ref.
Judgment & Decree
(a) Punjab Civil Servants Act (VIII of 1974)
S. 2(1)(a)
Punjab Civil Servants (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules, 1975-- Ad hoc appointee
Locus standi--Services of appellant an ex-Medical Officer on ad hoc appointment were terminated on account of misconduct
Appellant accepted offer of appointment fully knowing that his appointment was purely ad-hoc and subject to termination at any time without giving any notice and this ad-hoc appointment would not confer any right for regular appointment to same post
Appellant, thus, had no vested legal rights to continue in service once the Department had resorted to a fresh recruitment through prescribed method--An ad-hoc appointee, had no locus standi. 1982 SCMR 877 rel. (b) Punjab Civil Servants Act (VIII of 1974)
S. 2(1)(a)
Ad-hoc appointment not made in accordance with prescribed manner was liable to be terminated immediately on availability of recommendee of Public Service Commission
When appellant accepted ad hoc appointment which was only a stopgap arrangement, respondent employer, held, was under no legal obligation to regularise his service. Muhammad Siddique Ch.'s case PLD 1974 SC 393 ref. Ch. Mushtaq Masood for Appellant. A.G. Humayun, DA. for Respondents. Date of hearing: 2nd August, 1989.