MLD 2000

2000 PLP 1574 (MLD)

KHANWAIZ‑‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE and another‑‑‑Respondents

Jurisdiction / Court
Peshawar
Decided Date
Criminal Miscellaneous Application No.62 of 2000, decided on 10th April, 2000.
Honorable Judges
Talat Qayum Qureshi, J
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 2000 PLP 1574 (MLD)
Forum / Court Peshawar
Bench Members Talat Qayum Qureshi, J
Parties KHANWAIZ‑‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE and another‑‑‑Respondents
Primary Law Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2000 PLP 1574 (MLD)?

This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2000 PLP 1574 (MLD)?

The case was heard and decided by the Peshawar bench comprising: Talat Qayum Qureshi, J.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 2000 PLP 1574 (MLD) (KHANWAIZ‑‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE and another‑‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑

Representation

  • Abdul Shakoor Khan for Petitioner.
  • Haji Sabir Hussain Tanoli for Respondents.
  • Date of hearing: 10th April, 2000.

Headnotes / Summary

‑‑‑‑S.497‑‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.302‑‑‑Bail, grant of‑‑‑Bail was sought by accused on sole ground of his sickness‑‑‑Trial Court on the plea that accused was of unsound mind had referred accused to Mental Hospital where doctor after examining the accused had reported that he was suffering from Chronic Schzophenia‑‑‑Treatment of accused in jail was not possible as the same required combined use of drug physiotherapy and supported therapy‑ Parents of accused and his near relatives could help accused in their way of dealing to reduce his‑suffering ‑‑‑Accused, in circumstances, was admitted to bail.

Judgment & Decree

Date of hearing: 10th April, 2000. Having been involved in case registered vide F.I.R. No.288, dated 1‑8‑1999 under section 302, P.P.C. in Police Station Havelian, Abbottabad, the accused‑petitioner applied for his release on bail in the Court of learned Sessions Judge, Abbottabad but his application was dismissed vide order, dated 14‑1‑2000. He has now approached this Court for his release on bail.

2. The accused‑petitioner is charged under section 302, P.P.C. for murder of one Zardad. Challan of the case was put into the Court of learned Sessions Judge, Abbottabad but before framing the charge against the accused, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted an application under section 466(1), Cr.P.C. for his release on bail on the ground of his unsound mindedness. He was referred to Mental Hospital Dhodial for examination by Medical Superintendent concerned who examined him on 17‑7‑1999 and reported that he was suffering from Chroinc Schizo‑phrenia and was not in fit mental state to defend himself in the Court. On the basis of said report the learned Sessions Judge dismissed his petition vide order, dated 14‑1‑2000.

3. Mr. Abdul Shakoor Khan, Advocate, the learned counsel representing the petitioner argued that the petitioner has been confined in jail where proper facilities of treatment are not available to him. Moreover, due to his confinement, his condition is deteriorating day‑by‑day. If he is released on bail he would be properly treated and would be in a position to come back to the normal position and defend his case.

4. On the other hand, Mr. Ghulam Mujtaba Khan Jadoon, Advocate and Mr. Sabir Hussain Tanoli, Advocate, the learned counsel representing the complainant and State respectively opposed the release of accused -petitioner on bail on the ground that petitioner is violent and due to his mental disease he always used to abuse and misbehave his parents and even the accused once has caused serious injury to his father.

5. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and gone through the record.

6. The bail is prayed on the sole ground of sickness of applicant. The plea taken before the trial Court was that the applicant is of unsound mind and sick. He was referred to mental hospital Dhodial for examination and the report of the doctor is that he was suffering from Chronic Schizophrenia and the trial was adjourned sine die. No doubt the accused‑petitioner has been suffering from Schizophrenia but it is an admitted position that his treatment in jail is not possible. His treatment requires combined use of drug physiotherapy and supported therapy. Proper administration of drugs may reduce the sufferings of the petitioner and physiotherapy may also serve to relieve the petitioner's feeling of helplessness and isolation. His parents and near relatives living at home may also help him in their way of dealing to reduce his sufferings. I, therefore, admit him to bail provided he furnishes bail bonds to the tune of Rs.1,00,000 with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Additional Registrar of this Court. The sureties are directed that they shall take care of the accused‑petitioner so that he may not be able to cause injury to himself or to any other person. H.B.T./80/P Bail granted.