2007 P Cr (PLP)
BASHIR AHMAD — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 2007 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | BASHIR AHMAD — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2007 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2007 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2007 P Cr (PLP) (BASHIR AHMAD — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Ch. Muhammad Akram for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 497(2)
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.337-A(3)
Bone of contention was a piece of land owned by sister of the informant and accused
Informant wanted to grab said land for which resistance was being put by accused
Considering accused an obstacle in his way to fulfil his design, informant had lodged false report so as to entangle accused in a criminal case and to deter and refrain him from contesting the case of his sister
Such aspect of the case required further thorough probe
Declaration of fracture of nasal bone by Medical Officer was still to be examined and had to be proved through evidence by prosecution because delay of about 6/7 days occurring in the declaration of nasal fracture had somewhat created doubt
Accused was in jail since his arrest and was not required by the police any more
Report under S.173, Cr.P.C. had already been submitted in the Court of Ilaqa Magistrate
Informant and accused were real brothers and possibility to patch up their differences, could be hopefully seen due to their close relationship
Case falling within the domain of further inquiry, accused was admitted to bail, in circumstances.
Judgment & Decree
SH. HAKIM ALI, J.
Muhammad Ashraf son of Wali Muhammad got an F.I.R. No.262 of 2004, registered on 7-8-2004 with Police Station Fatehpur, District Layyah on 1-8-2004. The F.I.R. was got registered under section 337-A(3), P.P.C. The petitioner who was arrested in that case, had applied for bail after arrest before the learned Judicial Magistrate but remained unsuccessful on 3-9-2004. In another attempt to get concession of bail from the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge, the petitioner had also failed on 30-9-2004, hence this petition.
2. Allegation against the petitioner as narrated in the above mentioned F.I.R. is that at about 11-00 a.m. Bashir Ahmad, petitioner had reached at the land owned by the informant and used abusive language and inflicted two blows with "Trangri" that had hit the informant on his head, .face and nose. The occurrence was allegedly witnessed by one Gulzar Ahmad and Muhammad Akram. The motive stated in the F.I.R. was that Bashir Ahmad wanted to forcibly evict the informant from the land of Mst. Asia Bibi, sister of the informant. So he had committed the above noted offence.
3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has stated that Muhammad Ashraf, the informant is the real brother of the petitioner and is holding the possession of land forcibly as against the will and consent of Mst. Asia the real sister. The informant has got this false F.I.R. after obtaining fictitious/fake report from the doctor. Otherwise no such injuries were caused to the informant. He has further argued that informant is a hardened criminal, against whom so many cases were registered with Police Station Fatehpur, as well as with Karor Lal Essan.
4. Opposing the bail, learned counsel for the' State has stated that the petitioner is nominated in the F.I.R. with specific role, therefore, the petitioner is not entitled to any bail concession.
5. After considering the arguments and the perusal of the record, I have noted that F.I.R. itself has manifested the actual motivating force behind its registration. Muhammad Ashraf, the informant has himself in the F.I.R. that Bashir Ahmad, the accused, wanted to get forcible possession of land of his sister Mst. Asia and due to this, the accused had inflicted blows to him after using abusive language. In fact, this version has given an impression that the bone of contention was that piece of land which owned by the sister of the informant and the accused. The learned counsel has pointed out that the informant, in fact, wanted to grab this land, for which resistance was being put by the accused. Considering the accused an obstacle in his way fulfil his design, the informant had lodged this false report so as to entangle the petitioner in a criminal case and to deter and refrain the accused from fighting the case of his sister. This aspect of the case as has been narrated and presented by the learned counsel requires further thorough probe. The declaration of fracture of nasal bone by the Medical Officer is still to be examined and has to be proved through evidence by the prosecution because, the delay of about 6/7 days occurring in the declaration of nasal fracture has somewhat created doubt. The petitioner is in jail since 8-8-2004 and is not required by the police any more. Report under section 173 of the Cr.P.C. has already been submitted in the Court of learned Illaqa Magistrate. The informant and accused are real brothers and the possibility to patch up their differences can be hopefully seen due to their close relationship. In these above noted circumstances the case of the petitioner having fallen within the domain of further inquiry, the petitioner is accordingly admitted to bail subject to his furnishing bail bond of Rs.50,000 with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court. H.B.T./B-41/L Bail granted.