2004 PLP 12 (YLR)
MUHAMMAD ILYAS‑‑‑Applicant Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent
| Citation | 2004 PLP 12 (YLR) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi |
| Bench Members | Azizullah Memon, J |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD ILYAS‑‑‑Applicant Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2004 PLP 12 (YLR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2004 PLP 12 (YLR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: Azizullah Memon, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2004 PLP 12 (YLR) (MUHAMMAD ILYAS‑‑‑Applicant Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑‑‑S.497‑‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.302/201/34‑‑‑Bail, grant of‑‑‑Report of Chemical Analyser had shown that tests performed for detection of substances detailed therein were found negative, pertaining to articles referred to Chemical Analyser for such analysis and report‑‑ Report ‑of Special Medical Board which had examined deceased boy was in the negative showing that no poison was administered to him, in any form for the purpose of his murder‑‑‑Only evidence against accused was that of female who alleged that accused had threatened her to shut her mouth pertaining to incident otherwise she would be murdered‑‑‑Accused was admitted to bail, in circumstances. Tahseen Ahmed Qureshi for Applicant. Anwarul Hassan Ansari for the State.
Judgment & Decree
‑‑‑‑S.497‑‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.302/201/34‑‑‑Bail, grant of‑‑‑Report of Chemical Analyser had shown that tests performed for detection of substances detailed therein were found negative, pertaining to articles referred to Chemical Analyser for such analysis and report‑‑ Report ‑of Special Medical Board which had examined deceased boy was in the negative showing that no poison was administered to him, in any form for the purpose of his murder‑‑‑Only evidence against accused was that of female who alleged that accused had threatened her to shut her mouth pertaining to incident otherwise she would be murdered‑‑‑Accused was admitted to bail, in circumstances. Tahseen Ahmed Qureshi for Applicant. Anwarul Hassan Ansari for the State. Allowed subject to all just exceptions.
2. Learned counsel appearing for the State has read out the contents of the report of the Chemical Anaylser, in which it is mentioned that the tests performed (for the detection of the substances detailed therein were found negative, pertaining to the articles referred to him for such analysis and report (fully described in the said report) learned counsel for the State has further read out the contents of the report of Special Medical Board, who examined the deceased boy Farzan Ali and opined that no evidence was found by the said Board to arrive at the conclusion that the deceased boy was administered the poison, in any form, for the purpose of his murder. He has further stated that the only I evidence against the applicants is that of P.W. Mst. Khalida, who stated that the applicant threatened her to shut her mouth pertaining to the said incident, failing which, she was threatened by them to be poisoned and thereby to be murdered, exactly in the same manner as her son was done to death. Accordingly, applicant is admitted to bail with two sureties, each in the sum of Rs.200,000 and P.R. bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court, provided that as and when the prosecution is able to produce incriminating evidence against the accused/applicant before the trial Court, it shall be at liberty to move the trial Court for cancellation of bail granted to the applicant. H.B.T./M‑546/K Bail granted.