1983 PLP 1506 (CLC)
MESSRS ELECTRIC CONCERN CORPORATION‑Petitioner Versus CENTRAL BOARD OF REVENUE AND 2 OTHERS‑Respondents
| Citation | 1983 PLP 1506 (CLC) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Saad Saood Jan, J |
| Parties | MESSRS ELECTRIC CONCERN CORPORATION‑Petitioner Versus CENTRAL BOARD OF REVENUE AND 2 OTHERS‑Respondents |
| Primary Law | Provisional Constitution Order (1 of 1981)‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1983 PLP 1506 (CLC)?
This judgment primarily cites: Provisional Constitution Order (1 of 1981)‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1983 PLP 1506 (CLC)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Saad Saood Jan, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1983 PLP 1506 (CLC) (MESSRS ELECTRIC CONCERN CORPORATION‑Petitioner Versus CENTRAL BOARD OF REVENUE AND 2 OTHERS‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑. Art. 9(1)(a)(i) read with Customs Act (IV of 1969), S. 25‑A‑. Direction in matter of option‑Issuance of‑Customs authorities not accepting declared value of consignment and making their own assessment higher than that mentioned in invoice‑Customs authorities declining offer of petitioner (corprution) to acquire consignment‑Held, to acquire goods or not, matter of option with Customs authorities and no direction can be issued to them in this regard. Ch. Shaukat Ali for Applicant.
Judgment & Decree
‑‑. Art. 9(1)(a)(i) read with Customs Act (IV of 1969), S. 25‑A‑. Direction in matter of option‑Issuance of‑Customs authorities not accepting declared value of consignment and making their own assessment higher than that mentioned in invoice‑Customs authorities declining offer of petitioner (corprution) to acquire consignment‑Held, to acquire goods or not, matter of option with Customs authorities and no direction can be issued to them in this regard. Ch. Shaukat Ali for Applicant. The petitioner Corporation imported a consignment of enamelled copper wire from Singapur. For the purposes of customs duty and other charges the customs authorities did not accept the declared value of $ 3,600 per metric ton. but instead made their own assessment which was $ 1,000 higher than that mentioned in the invoice. The petitioner Corporation preferred an appeal before the Collector and a revision before the Government but with out any success. He has now invoked the constitutional jurisdiction of this Court.
2. It may be mentioned that the petitioner Corporation had made a offer to the customs authorities to acquire his consignment in accordance with the provisions of section 25‑A of the Customs Act. This offer was declined by the customs authorities. In this petition the petitioner Corporation has prayed that a direction be issued to the customs authorities to acquire his goods under section 25‑A of the Customs Act at the declared value.
3. Section 25‑A of the Customs Act reads as follows :‑ "If the appropriate officer finds that the value of the goods declared by the importer in the bill of entry is less than the value determined under section 25, he may, without prejudice to any other action which he may take in respect of the importer of such .goods require the importer to clear the goods on paying the duty on their value determined as aforesaid, or if the importer is unwilling, or fails, to do so, acquire them on behalf of the Federal Government by paying to the importer their value as declared in the bill of entry." A perusal of this section will show that it is matter of option with the customs authorities to acquire or not to acquire the goods. This being so no direction can be issued to the authorities in this regard. This writ petition is accordingly dismissed in limine. K. M. A. Petition dismissed.