PLD 1956

P L D (Rev (PLP)

THE OKARA BUS SERVICE, LTD.‑Appellant Versus (1) THE RAVI TRANSPORT Ca. REGD., (2) R. T. A. MULTAN‑Respondents

Jurisdiction / Court
Decided Date
Appellate Side No. 21 of 1955‑56, decided on 1st March 1956, District R. T. A. Multan.
Honorable Judges
Nasir Ahmad, Member, Board of Revenue, West Pakistan
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation P L D (Rev (PLP)
Forum / Court
Bench Members Nasir Ahmad, Member, Board of Revenue, West Pakistan
Parties THE OKARA BUS SERVICE, LTD.‑Appellant Versus (1) THE RAVI TRANSPORT Ca. REGD., (2) R. T. A. MULTAN‑Respondents
Primary Law Motor Vehicle
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in P L D (Rev (PLP)?

This judgment primarily cites: Motor Vehicle as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case P L D (Rev (PLP)?

The case was heard and decided by the bench comprising: Nasir Ahmad, Member, Board of Revenue, West Pakistan.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: P L D (Rev (PLP) (THE OKARA BUS SERVICE, LTD.‑Appellant Versus (1) THE RAVI TRANSPORT Ca. REGD., (2) R. T. A. MULTAN‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Motor Vehicle

Representation

  • Khawaja Abdur Rahim for Appellant.
  • Sh. Khurshid Ahmad for Respondent.

Headnotes / Summary

‑Route permits‑Increase in and grant to new companies should be gradual, without detriment to existing companies. Held, that while there is generally an all round increase in traffic, it, is advisable, in the absence of any definite statistical data, that there should be a gradual increase in transport facilities by issuing new permits to new companies, so that the Transport Authority gets into a better position to judge more clearly of what the requirements of the public are, without detriment to the interests of the existing companies. Secretary, R. T. A. for the Regional Transport Authority, Multan.

Judgment & Decree

NASIR AHMAD.‑This is an appeal against the order of the Regional Transport Authority. Multan dated 9th December 1955, by which three permits were granted to the respondents, the Ravi Transport Company, to ply between Okara and Nur Shah and another three permits to ply between Okara and Atari via Hujra. The Okara Bus Service who ply between Okara and Mandi Hira Singh have come up in appeal and the main ground taken up is that the Okara to Attari route is for all purposes the same as Okara to Mandi Hira Singh route along which they are already plying. The appellant company already have three permits for this route and it is urged that the state of the traffic does not justify an increase in the existing transport facilities which are sufficiently developed to meet present needs. As regards the grant for Okara‑Nur Shah route the appellant company have no objections to put forward. It is contended on behalf of the respondent company that traffic has increased con siderably which is evidenced by the fact that the appellants themselves started with one permit for this route which was subsequently raised to three in 1952. The Secretary R, T. A. is of the opinion that traffic has almost doubled though he is not able to give definite statistical data to support this view. He has, however, based his opinion on the increase in the number of prosecutions for over‑loading of passengers. There is undoubtedly a general all round increase in traffic unless there are adverse circumstances relating to a particular town which point to the contrary. It would, however, be some what optimistic to consider this increase to be double. It would all the same be advisable to make gradual increase in d transport facilities so that the Regional Transport Authority gets in a better position to judge more clearly what the requirements of the public are, without detriment to the interests of the existing transport companies. Though there is admittedly no data but following the above principle I would accept this appeal to the extent of reducing the permits granted to the respondent company from three to two for Okara Attari route. The number of permits granted to them on the other route ; Okara‑Nur Shah will stand. A. H. Appeal accepted in part.