1981 PLP 889 (SCMR)
GHULAM NABI AND 26 OTHERS-Petitioners Versus Seth MUHAMMAD YAQUB AND 4 others-Respondents
| Citation | 1981 PLP 889 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | -- Art. 185(2)-Appeal to Supreme Court-Value of; subject-matter of appeal in Court of first instance, in High Court, and in Supreme Court being Rs. 1,35,000, appeal, held, could be filed as a matter of right.-(Civil appeal). |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | GHULAM NABI AND 26 OTHERS-Petitioners Versus Seth MUHAMMAD YAQUB AND 4 others-Respondents |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1981 PLP 889 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1981 PLP 889 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the -- Art. 185(2)-Appeal to Supreme Court-Value of; subject-matter of appeal in Court of first instance, in High Court, and in Supreme Court being Rs. 1,35,000, appeal, held, could be filed as a matter of right.-(Civil appeal). bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1981 PLP 889 (SCMR) (GHULAM NABI AND 26 OTHERS-Petitioners Versus Seth MUHAMMAD YAQUB AND 4 others-Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Khawaja M. Tufail, Advocate Supreme Court, Ch. A. Waheed Salim, Advocate Supreme Court and S. Wajid Hussain, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioner.
- Raja Muhammad Anwar, Advocate Supreme Court and Muhammad Aslam, Advocate- on-Record for Respondents
- Date of hearing : 26thApril, 1980.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the judgment and order of the Lahore High Court, dated 26-11-1978, in R. F. A. No. 57(69). -- Art. 185(2)-Appeal to Supreme Court-Value of; subject-matter of appeal in Court of first instance, in High Court, and in Supreme Court being Rs. 1,35,000, appeal, held, could be filed as a matter of right.-[(Civil appeal)].
Judgment & Decree
KARAM ELAHEE CHAUHAN, J.-Seth Muhammad Yaqub (plaintiff) filed a suit for the specific performance on the basis of a contract for the sale of a property bearing No. SE-37-R-18, known as Fazal Manzil, situated on Dil Muhammad Road, Lahore, for a consideration of Rs. 1,85,00). The suit was decreed by the learned Civil Judge on 29-7-1959.
2. The defendants/petitioners filed a regular first appeal being R. F. A. No. 57/69 but without any success as the same was dismissed by the High Court on 26-11-1978, with some variation stated in para. 28 of its judgment.
3. The petitioners on 1-2-1979 have filed the present Petition for Special Leave to Appeal bearing No. 132 of .979 against the same.
4. When the petition came up before us today, the learned counsel pointed out that he has now filed a Civil Miscellaneous Application No. 366/80 in which he has prayed that this petition may be converted into and treated 'as an appeal inasmuch as the value of the subject-matter of this case in the Court of the first instance and in the High Court and in this Court is Rs. 1,35,000 and as such an appeal against the judgment of the High Court was available to him as of right under Article 185(2) of the Constitution. This proposition is not disputed by Rija Muhammad Anwer, learned counsel for the plaintiff/caveator. It was further submitted before us by the learned counsel for the parties that there was no period of limitation/described in the Limitation Act or the Supreme Court Rules as at present in force for such an appeal. In that view of the matter, since no question of limitation is involved, therefore, we convert this petition into an appeal which is available to the petitioner as of right, and direct the petitioners/appellants to pay the requisite court-fee within one month. The appeal is to be mad ready on the present record including the printed paper book of the High Court, Security Rs. 2,000 to be deposited within one month. Order accordingly.