PTD 1999

1999 PLP 3851 (PTD)

RAUNAQ INTERNATIONAL Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,

Jurisdiction / Court
231 I T R 106
Decided Date
Income-tax Reference No.74 of 1984, decided on 9th January, 1998.
Honorable Judges
R. C. Lahoti and Dalveer Bhandari, JJ
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1999 PLP 3851 (PTD)
Forum / Court 231 I T R 106
Bench Members R. C. Lahoti and Dalveer Bhandari, JJ
Parties RAUNAQ INTERNATIONAL Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,
Primary Law Income-tax
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1999 PLP 3851 (PTD)?

This judgment primarily cites: Income-tax as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1999 PLP 3851 (PTD)?

The case was heard and decided by the 231 I T R 106 bench comprising: R. C. Lahoti and Dalveer Bhandari, JJ.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1999 PLP 3851 (PTD) (RAUNAQ INTERNATIONAL Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Income-tax

Representation

  • However, as pointed out by learned senior standing counsel for the Department, this reference has been rendered academic merely in vices of the change, in law made effective retrospectively. The Finance Act, 1990, has introduced clause (iiia) in section 28 of the Income Tax Act; 1961, according to which proceeds of sale of licence granted under the imports (Control Order, 1955, made under the Imports and Exports (Control) Act, 1947, is income chargeable under the head "Profits and gains of business or profession". An amendment has also been effected in the definition of income in clause (24) of section 2 of the interpretation clause of the Act whereby any sum chargeable under clause (iiia) of section 28 is included in the definition of "income". These amendments, though inserted by the Finance Act of 1990, have been given a retrospective effect from April 1, 1962. The assessment year 1974-75 is clearly covered by the amendment. Thus whatever might have been the controversy earlier, the same does not survive for decision in view of the amendments referred to hereinabove, according to which the premium earned by the assessee is liable to be taxed as "income" under the head "Profits and gains of business or profession".

Headnotes / Summary

Income

Premium earned, on sale of import entitlement --Is income liable to tax

Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, Ss.2(24)(va) & 28(iiia) [as amended by Indian Finance Act, 1990, with retrospective effect from 1-4-162] The Finance Act, 1990, has introduced clause (iiia) in section 28 the Income Tax Act, 1961, according to which proceeds of sale of licence, ranted under the Imports (Control) Order, 1955, made under the Import, and Exports (Control) Act, 1947, is income chargeable under the he d "Profits and gains of business or profession". An amendment has also been effected in the definition of income in clause (24) of section 2 by the insertion of sub-clause (va) whereby any sum chargeable under clause (iiia) of section 28 is included in the definition of "income". These amendment though inserted by the Finance Act of 1990, have been given retrospective effect from April 1, 1962. The assessment year 1974-75 is covered by the amendment. Therefore, premium earned by the assessee on the transfer of import entitlements is income liable to tax under the head "Profits and gain of business or profession". Nemo for the Assessee. , R. D. Jolly, Ms. Prem Lata Barisal, Sanjeev Khanna and \j ay .11, for the Commissioner..

Judgment & Decree

The Finance Act, 1990, has introduced clause (iiia) in section 28 the Income Tax Act, 1961, according to which proceeds of sale of licence, ranted under the Imports (Control) Order, 1955, made under the Import, and Exports (Control) Act, 1947, is income chargeable under the he d "Profits and gains of business or profession". An amendment has also been effected in the definition of income in clause (24) of section 2 by the insertion of sub-clause (va) whereby any sum chargeable under clause (iiia) of section 28 is included in the definition of "income". These amendment though inserted by the Finance Act of 1990, have been given retrospective effect from April 1, 1962. The assessment year 1974-75 is covered by the amendment. Therefore, premium earned by the assessee on the transfer of import entitlements is income liable to tax under the head "Profits and gain of business or profession". Nemo for the Assessee. , R. D. Jolly, Ms. Prem Lata Barisal, Sanjeev Khanna and \j ay .11, for the Commissioner.. R. C. .LAHOTI, J.--This is a reference under section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, arising out of the assessment year 1974-75 and ml(! at the instance of the assessee seeking the opinion of the High Court on t!-, following question of law "Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the premium of Rs.4,75,322 earned on transfer of import entitlement is income liable to tax?" The plea raised on behalf of the assessee was that the transfer o; import entitlements amounted to a transfer of source- of income and therefore, should not be treated as revenue receipt. This plea did not find favour with the Tribunal and the premium earned by the assessee has been held liable to tax. However, as pointed out by learned senior standing counsel for the Department, this reference has been rendered academic merely in vices of the change, in law made effective retrospectively. The Finance Act, 1990, has introduced clause (iiia) in section 28 of the Income Tax Act; 1961, according to which proceeds of sale of licence granted under the imports (Control Order, 1955, made under the Imports and Exports (Control) Act, 1947, is income chargeable under the head "Profits and gains of business or profession". An amendment has also been effected in the definition of income in clause (24) of section 2 of the interpretation clause of the Act whereby any sum chargeable under clause (iiia) of section 28 is included in the definition of "income". These amendments, though inserted by the Finance Act of 1990, have been given a retrospective effect from April 1, 1962. The assessment year 1974-75 is clearly covered by the amendment. Thus whatever might have been the controversy earlier, the same does not survive for decision in view of the amendments referred to hereinabove, according to which the premium earned by the assessee is liable to be taxed as "income" under the head "Profits and gains of business or profession". For the foregoing reasons, the reference is held to have rendered academic merely and hence is returned unanswered. M.B.A./4213/,FC Order accordingly