1981 PLP 1074 (CLC)
PAKISTAN FISHERIES LTD.‑ — Petitioner Versus DEPUTY COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS AND 2 OTHERS — ‑‑Respondents
| Citation | 1981 PLP 1074 (CLC) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | PAKISTAN FISHERIES LTD.‑ — Petitioner Versus DEPUTY COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS AND 2 OTHERS — ‑‑Respondents |
| Primary Law | (a) Constitution of Pakistan (1973) ‑‑, (b) Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1981 PLP 1074 (CLC)?
This judgment primarily cites: (a) Constitution of Pakistan (1973) ‑‑, (b) Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1981 PLP 1074 (CLC)?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1981 PLP 1074 (CLC) (PAKISTAN FISHERIES LTD.‑ — Petitioner Versus DEPUTY COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS AND 2 OTHERS — ‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Nafisuddin and Abdul Hamid for Petitioners.
- Hamid Hussain for Respondents.
Headnotes / Summary
Art. 199 (a) (li)‑Lawful authority‑Petitioners having previously contended not to have imported goods of different nature intention a11y than those covered by licence‑‑Petitioners, held, cannot be allowed at writ stage to plead a different case and argue that goods conform to and fall within classification for which licence issued‑Impugned orders having been passed in exercise of lawful authority, not illegal or without jurisdiction merely because of quantum of fine imposed being different from that in similar cases.
Judgment & Decree
(a) Constitution of Pakistan (1973) ‑‑
‑ Art. 199 (a) (ii)‑Disputed question of fact‑Question whether goods in dispute fall within classification for which licence issued or soma other classification ‑A question of fact and its determination within jurisdiction of custom authority‑Both classifications covering imported goods an attempt to decide such question of fact in writ proceedings, held, improper.‑.[Question of fact]. (b) Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑
Art. 199 (a) (li)‑Lawful authority‑Petitioners having previously contended not to have imported goods of different nature intention a11y than those covered by licence‑‑Petitioners, held, cannot be allowed at writ stage to plead a different case and argue that goods conform to and fall within classification for which licence issued‑Impugned orders having been passed in exercise of lawful authority, not illegal or without jurisdiction merely because of quantum of fine imposed being different from that in similar cases. Nafisuddin and Abdul Hamid for Petitioners. Hamid Hussain for Respondents. Date of hearing : 4th November, 1980.