2011 PLP 2007 (YLR)
MAHESH KUMAR — Petitioner Versus S.H.O. POLICE STATION CITY, JACOBABAD and 2 others — Respondents
| Citation | 2011 PLP 2007 (YLR) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi |
| Bench Members | Imam Bux Baloch, J |
| Parties | MAHESH KUMAR — Petitioner Versus S.H.O. POLICE STATION CITY, JACOBABAD and 2 others — Respondents |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2011 PLP 2007 (YLR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2011 PLP 2007 (YLR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: Imam Bux Baloch, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2011 PLP 2007 (YLR) (MAHESH KUMAR — Petitioner Versus S.H.O. POLICE STATION CITY, JACOBABAD and 2 others — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Inayatullah G. Morio for Petitioner.
- Heard Mr.lnayatullah G. Morio, advocate for the petitioner and Mr. Azizul Haq Solangi: Asstt: A.-G.
Headnotes / Summary
Art. 199
Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), S.154
Constitutional petition
Petitioner sought direction for registration of criminal case against the employees of the Electric Supply Company for disconnecting electricity and threatening the petitioner with dire consequences
High Court directed the S.H.O. to record the statement of the petitioner under S.154, Cr.P.C. if cognizable offence was made out
Constitutional petition was disposed of accordingly. Azizul Haq Solangi, Asstt: A.-G.
Judgment & Decree
IMAM BUX BALOCH, J.
The petitioner stated in his petition that on 7-6-2010 Rasheed Abbasi, Line Superintendent-1 Jacobabad in the capacity of Incharge SDO/Assistant Manager (Operation) HESCO Sub-Division Jacobabad in absence of the petitioner came to his house, harassed the women folks and misbehaved with them on the pretext to show the paid electricity bill. The ladies showed him the last electricity paid bill and informed him that new bill has not yet been received to them but even then he illegally, violating the provisions of Electricity Act, removed the electricity meter and service wire without any cause or reason. When new bill was received to the petitioner on 9-6-2010, he paid the same on 10th July, 2010 and approached the said Rasheed Abbasi and supplied photo copy of paid bill and requested him to restore the electricity but he refused. The petitioner further stated that he has filed C.P. No.1212 of 2010 against HESCO authorities including Rasheed Abbasi and notices of that petition were served-upon Rasheed Ahmed but they did not restore the electricity connection of the petitioner; on the contrary, they issued threats of dire consequences. On the directions of this Court, the interim order was passed dated 18-6-2010 in Petition No. 1212 of 2010 directing the HESCO authorities to restore the electricity of the petitioner. It is further case of the petitioner that on 24-6-2010 at 10-00 a.m. when the petitioner along with Raj Kumar son of Motimal and Widhay Kumar son of Lal Chand were sitting in a room of his house to be called as Otaq, Rasheed Abbasi, Line Superintendent-1 along with his friend Harpal Dass son of Rolomal and his sub-ordinate staff came and asked as to how the petitioner is using electricity. The petitioner informed them that he is not using electricity of HESCO but is generating it by operating generator and UPS, which annoyed Rasheed Abbasi and his subordinate staff; who misbehaved with the petitioner. It is further case of the petitioner that he approached the respondents Nos.1 and 2 for registration of the case but his F.I.R. was not registered. He has prayed as under: (a) that this honourable Court be pleased to direct the respondent No.1 to register F.I.R. of the petitioner against accused Rasheed Abbasi Line Superintendent-I HESCO Jacobabad, Harpal Dass and his subordinate staff. (b) . (c) . Heard Mr.lnayatullah G. Morio, advocate for the petitioner and Mr. Azizul Haq Solangi: Asstt: A.-G. Learned Asstt: A.-G. states that the respondent No.1 may be directed to record the statement of thee petitioner and if a cognizable offence is made out his statement be incorporated in 154, Cr.P.C. Book. Consequently, the S.H.O. Police Station City Jacobabad to record the statement of the petitioner and if any cognizable offence is made out his statement be incorporated in 154 Cr.P.C. Book. The SIO Police Station City Jacobabad is directed to complete the investigation within a period of 2 weeks and submit report under section 173, Cr.P.C. to the concerned Court having jurisdiction. With the above observation, this petition is disposed of. A.R.K./M-52/K Order accordingly.