2001 PLP 1258 (CLC)
MUHAMMAD SHARIF‑‑‑Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH, COOPERATIVE DEPARTMENT through Secretary, Sindh Secretariat, Karachi and 2 others‑‑‑Respondents
| Citation | 2001 PLP 1258 (CLC) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi |
| Bench Members | Zahid Kurban Alavi and Mushir Alam, JJ |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD SHARIF‑‑‑Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH, COOPERATIVE DEPARTMENT through Secretary, Sindh Secretariat, Karachi and 2 others‑‑‑Respondents |
| Primary Law | Cooperative Societies Act (VII of 1925) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2001 PLP 1258 (CLC)?
This judgment primarily cites: Cooperative Societies Act (VII of 1925) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2001 PLP 1258 (CLC)?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: Zahid Kurban Alavi and Mushir Alam, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2001 PLP 1258 (CLC) (MUHAMMAD SHARIF‑‑‑Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH, COOPERATIVE DEPARTMENT through Secretary, Sindh Secretariat, Karachi and 2 others‑‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Kazi Wali Muhammad for Petitioner.
- Sarwar Khan, Addl. A.‑G. for Respondent No. 1.
- Arif Bilal Sherwani for Respondents Nos.2 and 3.
Headnotes / Summary
S.43
Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.199
Constitutional petition
Affairs of Cooperative Society
Administrator Duties and functions
Appointment of Administrator
Scope of functions and duties of the Administrator should be restricted to investigating the affairs of the Society providing a detailed report and thereafter creating a situation conducive to the holding of elections of the Society and handling the Society back to its members‑‑‑Inquiry report having not been communicated to the Registrar, Cooperative Societies by the Administrator which was mandatory petitioner could contest show‑cause notice after receipt of the inquiry report t and after hearing the petitioner the Deputy Registrar would pass appropriate order as required under the Cooperative Societies Act, 1925 High Court observed that the patties might avail remedy as provided under the Cooperative Societies Act, 1925 and disposed the petition accordingly.
Judgment & Decree
S.43
Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.199
Constitutional petition
Affairs of Cooperative Society
Administrator Duties and functions
Appointment of Administrator
Scope of functions and duties of the Administrator should be restricted to investigating the affairs of the Society providing a detailed report and thereafter creating a situation conducive to the holding of elections of the Society and handling the Society back to its members‑‑‑Inquiry report having not been communicated to the Registrar, Cooperative Societies by the Administrator which was mandatory petitioner could contest show‑cause notice after receipt of the inquiry report t and after hearing the petitioner the Deputy Registrar would pass appropriate order as required under the Cooperative Societies Act, 1925 High Court observed that the patties might avail remedy as provided under the Cooperative Societies Act, 1925 and disposed the petition accordingly. Kazi Wali Muhammad for Petitioner. Sarwar Khan, Addl. A.‑G. for Respondent No.
1. Arif Bilal Sherwani for Respondents Nos.2 and
3. The inquiry report has not been communicated to the Society as no proof has been produced by the counsel appearing for the respondents. The communication of the enquiry report is mandatory under section 43, subsection (4) of the Cooperative Societies Act, 1925. Without going into the merits of the position of each side, we direct that the enquiry report should be given to the petitioner. The petitioner would then be empowered under the law to initiate any proceeding. However, it should be kept in mind that the Cooperative Societies Act provides for a hierarchy that should be followed by the Society. In the interim period, if any, liquidator is appointed then the proceedings so initiated shall be stopped. According to the counsel an Administrator is already looking after the affairs of the Society. We order that the Administrator so appointed by the Registrar shall continue to look after the affairs of the Society for the interim period only. The moment the petitioner contests the show‑cause notice he shall be well within his rights to challenge the continuation in office of the Administrator. At the outset we may observe that in the present case and in similar other matters Administrators once appointed continue in office sometime indefinitely. The Cooperative Societies Act has provided for all eventualities and we feel that even though the provision of appointment of Administrator is there the scope of the Administrator should be restricted to investigating the affairs of the Society providing a detailed report and thereafter operating a situation conducive to the holding of the elections of the Society and handing the Society back to its members. The petitioner shall contest show‑cause notice, dated 27‑5‑1998 after receipt of the enquiry report and after hearing the petitioner, the Deputy Registrar shall pass an appropriate order as required under the Cooperative Societies Act and the parties may avail remedy as provided under the Cooperative Societies Act. With the above observations the petition alongwith pending applications stand disposed of. Q.M.H./M.A.K./M‑148/K Order accordingly.