2010 PLP 7 (CLC)
MUHAMMAD NAEEM and 2 others — Petitioners Versus LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR, BOARD OF REVENUE PUNAJB, LAHORE
| Citation | 2010 PLP 7 (CLC) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD NAEEM and 2 others — Petitioners Versus LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR, BOARD OF REVENUE PUNAJB, LAHORE |
| Primary Law | Land Acquisition Act (I of 1894) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2010 PLP 7 (CLC)?
This judgment primarily cites: Land Acquisition Act (I of 1894) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2010 PLP 7 (CLC)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2010 PLP 7 (CLC) (MUHAMMAD NAEEM and 2 others — Petitioners Versus LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR, BOARD OF REVENUE PUNAJB, LAHORE). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Mian M. Waseem and Sana Ullah Chaudhry for Petitioner.
- Sh. Farooq Hussain, Legal Advisor for Respondent No.5.
- 4. The learned Assistant Advocate-General on the other hand, contends that the petitioners cannot be said to have any grievance as admittedly they are not vested with any title in the suit-land. He, however, undertakes at the bar and explains that the land comprising Khasra No.1765/1 measuring 2 Kanals, 17 Marlas and 175 sq. feet has been acquired which is at a distance of only few hundred feet from the said graveyard land mentioned in the writ petition and the respondents shall take all steps to make arrangements for shifting of the graves from the affected portion to the said acquired land and to bury the remains strictly in accordance with the Islamic Injunctions in cooperation with the concerned persons.
Headnotes / Summary
Ss.4, 5-A & 6
Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.199
Constitutional petition
Objection to acquisition
Graveyard was sought to be acquired by the authority, petitioners who were resident of village concerned, had objected to said acquisition
Authority had stated that portion of the graveyard was coming in the right of way of the proposed Ring Road'; and that in order to relocate the same the Provincial Government had acquired land where affected graves will be shifted to the said land
No doubt, a graveyard could not be acquired under the law and graveyard had been excluded, however the contention of State Counsel was that the petitioners had no locus standi to file constitutional petition as they had no interest in the land in question
In view of the categorical stand taken by the Authorities that arrangements had been made to shift the graves from the acquired portion and to burying the remains in land already acquired by the Government for that purpose
Constitutional petition was disposed of by the High Court with the direction that before executing the project at the relevant location, the graves from the affected portion would be shifted to the place which was acquired for that purpose.
Judgment & Decree
MAULVI ANWARUL HAQ, J.
According to the contents of this writ petition, the petitioners are residents of village Handu Tehsil Lahore Cantt: and there is a graveyard comprising Khasra Nos. 1750, 1759 and 1760 total measuring 22 Kanals and 15 Marlas as per entries in the Register Haqdaran Zamin for the year 1997-1998 (Annexure "A"). The grievance being made out is that the land in the said graveyard has not been acquired but the respondents in the process of executing a project namely "Ring Road" are trying to encroach upon the said rand. The respondents in their reply have taken objections that the petitioners have no locus standi to file the suit as they have no interest in the land in question. It has been additionally stated that portion of the graveyard is coming in the right of way of the "Ring Road" and in order to relocate the same, the Provincial Government has acquired land measuring 2 Kanals, 17 Marlas and 175 sq. feet in Khasra No.1765/1 and the affected graves will be shifted to the said land. It has further been stated that all efforts have been made to avoid the said land under the graveyard, but, because of the over all design, the land to the said extent has to be utilized for the project which is being executed for the public welfare.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioners contend that under the law graveyard cannot be acquired and even in the relevant notification the same has been excluded and as such the respondents have no lawful authority to utilize the land under the graveyard in the said project.
4. The learned Assistant Advocate-General on the other hand, contends that the petitioners cannot be said to have any grievance as admittedly they are not vested with any title in the suit-land. He, however, undertakes at the bar and explains that the land comprising Khasra No.1765/1 measuring 2 Kanals, 17 Marlas and 175 sq. feet has been acquired which is at a distance of only few hundred feet from the said graveyard land mentioned in the writ petition and the respondents shall take all steps to make arrangements for shifting of the graves from the affected portion to the said acquired land and to bury the remains strictly in accordance with the Islamic Injunctions in cooperation with the concerned persons.
5. I have given some thought to the respective contentions of the learned counsel for the parties and the learned law Officer.
6. No doubt a graveyard cannot be acquired under the law and even in the Award, Annexure "D", the land under the graveyard has been excluded. At the same time, the contention of the learned A.A.-G. that the petitioners would not be having any locus standi to file this writ petition is supported by the judgment cited by the learned A.A.-G. rendered in the case of Raja Ali Shan v. Messrs Essem Hotet Limited and others 2007 SCMR 741, and in view of the categorical stand taken by the respondents in their reply and further as undertaken at bar by the learned A.A.-G. that arrangements have been made to shift the graves from the affected portion and to bury the remains in land already acquired but the Provincial Government for the purpose. The W.P. is sans grievance when there is no denial that the project being executed is for the public good.
7. Writ petition is accordingly, disposed of with the direction that before executing the project at the relevant location, the graves from the affected portions shall be shifted to Khasra No.1765/1. No order as to costs. H.B.T./M-803/L Order accordingly.