2020 PLP 1237 (MLD)
Mir WALI KHAN — Petitioner Versus The STATE through F.I.A. — Respondent
| Citation | 2020 PLP 1237 (MLD) |
| Forum / Court | Gilgit-Baltistan Chief Court |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | Mir WALI KHAN — Petitioner Versus The STATE through F.I.A. — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2020 PLP 1237 (MLD)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2020 PLP 1237 (MLD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Gilgit-Baltistan Chief Court bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2020 PLP 1237 (MLD) (Mir WALI KHAN — Petitioner Versus The STATE through F.I.A. — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Mohammad Farooq Umer for Petitioner.
- Deputy Advocate General for the State.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 497
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 420
Foreigners Act (XXXI of 1964), S. 14
Cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property
Accused had valid Form-B issued by National Database and Registration Authority and his name appeared at serial No.4 of the said Form-B as such he was resident of Swat
Death certificate of father of the accused showed that he had expired at Khaja-abad, Swat and he was buried there also, thus accused had been residing in Khyber Pakhtunkwa Province (Pakistan) since long
Offence under S.14(1) of Foreigners Act, 1946, did not fall within the ambit of prohibitory clause of S.497(1), Cr.P.C.
Section 420, P.P.C. was bailable
Judgment & Decree
ALI BAIG, J.
Through the instant bail petition filed under section 497, Cr.P.C., the petitioner/accused has sought post-arrest bail in case FIR No.02/2020 dated 17.01.2020, registered under section 420, P.P.C. and section 14 Foreigners Act, 1946, at Police Station No.14, FIA Sub-Circle Gilgit.
2. Briefly allegation against the petitioner as narrated in the FIR is that, on spy information, the FIA authorities arrested the petitioner/ accused on 17-01-2020 from Gilgit bazaar and during inquiry, the FIA authorities have found that the petitioner is a foreigner and his CNIC was cancelled by NADRA.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner/accused has contended that the petitioner/accused is Pakistani national and he belongs to KPK. Presently, he is residing at Gilgit and carrying his business. The learned counsel for the petitioners/accused has further contended that he has valid Form-B which is annexed with the bail petition. The learned counsel for the petitioner/accused has further argued that the petitioner is citizen of Pakistan and police has falsely implicated him in this case with mala fide intention.
4. Conversely, the learned Deputy Attorney General has opposed this petition by contending that the petitioner/accused is not citizen of Pakistan as he does not possess valid documents of citizenship in his possession, therefore, the FIA authorities have rightly implicated him in this case.
5. I have carefully considered the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Deputy Attorney General and perused the record of the case.
6. Admittedly, Section 420, P.P.C. is bailable. From perusal of record, it reveals that the petitioner has valid Form-B issued by NADRA and his name is appearing at serial No.4 of the said Form-B as such he is resident of Swat. Moreover, counsel for the petitioner has also produced a copy of death certificate of father of the petitioner, wherein, it is mentioned that father of the petitioner has expired on 13-02-1996 at KhajaAbad Swat and he has been buried at Swat, thus petitioner is residing in KPK province of Pakistan since long. Moreover, offence under section 14(1) of Foreigners Act, 1946 does not fall within the ambit of prohibitory clause of section 497(1), Cr.P.C. hence the petitioner is entitled for concession of bail.
7. For what has been discussed above, this petition is allowed. Consequently, the petitioner is admitted to post arrest bail subject to his furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs.300,000/- (Rupees Three Lac) with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial court. File. ADN/24/GB Bail allowed.