1992 P Cr (PLP)
ABDUL GHAFOOR — Appellant Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 1992 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | ABDUL GHAFOOR — Appellant Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1992 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1992 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1992 P Cr (PLP) (ABDUL GHAFOOR — Appellant Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 426
Penal Code (XLV of 180(1), Ss.489-B & 489-C
Mere look at the counterfeit currency notes prima facie did not convince that the same were counterfeit so as. to raise a presumption that accused knew or had reason to believe that the said currency notes were counterfeit
Sentence awarded to accused was consequently suspended and he was released on bail.
Judgment & Decree
Appellant Abdul Ghafoor who was convicted for the offence under sections 489-B and 489-C, P.P.C. to suffer R.I. for 10 years and a fine of Rs.50,000 and to suffer R.I. for 7 years and a fine of Rs.50,000 respectively, has applied for the suspension of the sentence mainly on the ground that co-accused Abdul Ghafoor Bhatti, who was found guilty for the offence under section 489-C, P.P.C. was allowed bail by this Court.
2. I have heard Mr. Sardar Muhammad Ishaque, learned counsel for appellant and Mr. Abdul Hakeern Khan H. Bijarani, learned A.A.-G. for State. The latter has opposed the application for suspension of sentence.
3. The learned counsel for appellant has assailed the finding of the trial Court and to support his contention he has placed reliance upon the cases of Sattu Khan and others v. The State reported in 1988 S C M R 241 and Ali Asghar and another v. The State reported in 1991 P Cr. L J 746 in an attempt to satisfy this Court that the finding on merits can be examined while deciding an application for suspension of sentence. The learned counsel for appellant has also placed reliance upon the cases of M. Mammutti v. The State of Karnataka reported in A I R 1979 SC 1705, Hasan v. The State reported in 1984 P Cr. L J 1281 and Tariq v. The State reported in 1991 M L D 2173. In the first cited authority the Supreme Court of India held that where the counterfeit currency notes were of such nature that mere look at them would not convince anybody that they were counterfeit, then the presumption that accused knew or had reason to believe that the same were counterfeit cannot be drawn.
4. Respectfully following the rule laid down in the above-cited judgments, I am of the tentative view that the evidence to this effect is lacking in this case and consequently, the appellant is entitled to the grant of bail. Accordingly, the application made under section 426, Cr.P.C. is granted and 8 the sentence awarded to appellant is suspended, who shall be released on bail in the sum of Rs.1,00,000 (Rs. one lac) with two sureties o1 Rs.50,000 each and P.R. bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Nazir of this Court. N.H.Q./A-1217/K Sentence suspended.