YLR 2008

2008 PLP 945 (YLR)

MUHAMMAD BOOTA — Petitioner Versus THE STATE and others — Respondents

Jurisdiction / Court
Lahore
Decided Date
Writ Petition No.4503 of 2007, decided on 10th September, 2007.
Honorable Judges
Mian Muhammad Najam-uz-Zaman and Ijaz Ahmad Chaudhry, JJ
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 2008 PLP 945 (YLR)
Forum / Court Lahore
Bench Members Mian Muhammad Najam-uz-Zaman and Ijaz Ahmad Chaudhry, JJ
Parties MUHAMMAD BOOTA — Petitioner Versus THE STATE and others — Respondents
Primary Law Penal Code (XLV of 1860)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2008 PLP 945 (YLR)?

This judgment primarily cites: Penal Code (XLV of 1860) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2008 PLP 945 (YLR)?

The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Mian Muhammad Najam-uz-Zaman and Ijaz Ahmad Chaudhry, JJ.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 2008 PLP 945 (YLR) (MUHAMMAD BOOTA — Petitioner Versus THE STATE and others — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Penal Code (XLV of 1860)

Representation

  • Babar Murtaza Khan for Petitioner.

Headnotes / Summary

Ss. 302(a) & 337-A(i)(ii)/34

Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.199--Constitutional petition

Default in payment of compensation

Due to some clerical error, period to be undergone by the petitioner in case he failed to pay the amount of compensation, did not find mention in the judgment of Appellate Court

While rectifying the said error, it was directed by the High Court, that in default of payment of compensation, petitioner would further undergo three months S.I. and that amount of compensation, was recoverable from the petitioner as arrears of land revenue. Sarfraz Ali Khan, A.A.-.G. for the State.

Judgment & Decree

Through this petition following prayer has been made:

"In the light of the submissions made above any order or direction may graciously be issued to the respondents to include the remissions legally granted and earned by the petitioner and the same be ordered to be entered in the remissions sheet/Jail Roll of the petitioner from the time of his arrest. The cancellation of the remissions may graciously be set aside. Any other relief to which the petitioner is entitled from the facts and circumstances narrated above may also be granted to the petitioner in the prime interest of justice and the petitioner be ordered to be released from jail at the earliest."

2. The learned Law Officer after going through the record submits that the petitioner has already undergone his sentence of imprisonment and he is behind the bars for non-payment of compensation liable to be paid by the petitioner in view of the judgment dated 20-8-2002 passed by this Court while deciding M.R. No.291 of 1998.

3. Learned counsel submits that he would be satisfied if some time limit is fixed for keeping the petitioner behind the bars, in case he fails to pay compensation. Learned Law Officer has no objection.

4. Record of this case reveals that the petitioner and his co-accused were tried by Additional Sessions Judge, Sheikhupura in case F.I.R. No.149, dated 25-3-1995 for the offence under sections 302/337-A(i)(ii)/34, P.P.C. registered at Police Station, A. Division, Sheikhupura who vide judgment dated 23-4-1998 while convicting them under section 302(a), P.P.C. read with section 34, P.P.C. awarded death sentence to each of them. They were also sentenced under Sections 337-A(i)/337-A(ii) read with Section 34 P.P.C. and sentenced to one year R.I on each count. The trial Court also directed them to pay Rs.2,000 each as Daman and Rs.5,000 each as Arsh. Appeal against the said judgment i.e. Crl. Appeal No.380/1998 filed by convicts and Reference made by the Trial Court i.e. M.R. No.291 of 1998, were decided by Division Bench of this Court vide judgment dated 20-8-2002. The appellate Bench while dismissing the appeal converted the sentence of the petitioner to imprisonment for life 'with the benefit of section 382-B, Cr.P.C. The petitioner was also directed to pay Rs.50,000 as compensation under section 544-A, Cr.P.C. We have observed that due to some clerical error the period to be undergo by the petitioner in case he fails to pay the compensation does not find mention in the judgment of Appellate Court accordingly, while rectifying the said error it is directed that in default of payment of compensation the petitioner shall further undergo three months S.I. it is further directed that the amount of compensation is recoverable from the petitioner as arrear of land revenue. With this correction in the said judgment this petition stands disposed of. H.B.T./M-629/L Order accordingly.