P L D 1979 Lahore 23 (PLP)
Before Saad Saood Jan, J Versus MALIK KHAN-Respondent
| Citation | P L D 1979 Lahore 23 (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Land Reforms Regulation, 1972 M. L. R. 115‑ |
| Bench Members | Saad Saood Jan, J |
| Parties | Before Saad Saood Jan, J Versus MALIK KHAN-Respondent |
| Primary Law | Land Reforms Regulation, 1972 [M. L. R. 115]‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in P L D 1979 Lahore 23 (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: Land Reforms Regulation, 1972 [M. L. R. 115]‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case P L D 1979 Lahore 23 (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Land Reforms Regulation, 1972 M. L. R. 115‑ bench comprising: Saad Saood Jan, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: P L D 1979 Lahore 23 (PLP) (Before Saad Saood Jan, J Versus MALIK KHAN-Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Islam All Qureshi for Petitioners.
- Sardar Attaullah for Respondent.
Headnotes / Summary
24 LAHORE ALL - ‑ Paras. 7 & 12‑Pre‑emption ‑Word "Kharif"‑Respondent, a tenant at‑will, not showing to have had preferential ,right of pre‑emption on date of impugned sale‑Right of pre‑emption coming into existence from Kharif 1972, "Kharif" meaning season falling between summer and winter, and sale taking place in middle of summer, respondent, held, not possessed of superior right of pre‑emption at time of sale, hence, not entitled to pre‑empt.‑[Pre‑emption‑Words and phrases]. Ferozul Loghaat Farsi and Udru Loghaat compiled by Urdu Markazi Board ref.
Judgment & Decree
This civil revision arises out of a suit brought by the respondent to pre‑empt a sale of about 3 marlas of agricultural land made by petitioner No. 1 in favour of her daughter who is petitioner No.
2. The sale was effected through a registered sale deed dated 27‑6‑
72. The respondent based his superior right on the assertion that he was a tenant‑at‑will in the land effected by the sale. The trial Court dismissed the suit on 26‑6‑
74. The respondent preferred an appeal which was accepted by the District Judge, Jhelum on 11‑2‑75.
2. The only question for consideration in this civil revision is whether the right of pre‑emption was available to the respondent. It is not disputed before me that the respondent was a tenant‑at‑will in the land in dispute. In order to succeed in the suit it was necessary for the respondent to show that his preferential right existed at the time when the sale was made, for the right of pre‑emption is in fact a right of substitution. As already stated above the sale was effected on 27‑6
72. The right of pre‑emption was conferred for the first time upon tenants‑at‑will by Martial Law Regulation No.
115. By expression this right was to come into existence from Kharif, 1972. The expression Kharif has not been defined in the regulation. In Ferozul Loghaat Fars; the word `Kharif' is described to connote Savni or the weather in which the Jowar and Makaee are found. According to the Urdu Loghaat compiled by the Urdu Markazi Board the word `kharif' means that the crop which is found in autumn. It appears to me that kharlf refers to the season which falls between the summer and the winter season. In thi case the impugned sale took place in the middle of the summer season which could hardly be described as kharif. I should, therefore, think that at the time of the impugned sale the respondent did not possess any superior right of pre‑emption.
3. For the reasons stated above, I accept this civil revision, set aside the judgment and decree of the learned District Judge and dismiss the suit of the respondent with costs throughout. S. A. H. Revision accepted.