1987 PLP 768 (SCMR)
TARIQ MAHMOOD‑‑Petitioner Versus PAKISTAN TELEVISION CORPORATION and others‑‑Respondents
| Citation | 1987 PLP 768 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Afzal Zullah, Mian Burhanuddin Khan and Saad Saood Jan, JJ |
| Parties | TARIQ MAHMOOD‑‑Petitioner Versus PAKISTAN TELEVISION CORPORATION and others‑‑Respondents |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1987 PLP 768 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1987 PLP 768 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Muhammad Afzal Zullah, Mian Burhanuddin Khan and Saad Saood Jan, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1987 PLP 768 (SCMR) (TARIQ MAHMOOD‑‑Petitioner Versus PAKISTAN TELEVISION CORPORATION and others‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Abid Hasan Minto, Advocate Supreme Court and Inayat Hussain Shah, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the judgment and order of Lahore High Court, Lahore dated 24‑11‑1986 passed in Writ Petition No.3109 of 1979). ‑‑‑Art. 185(3)‑‑Corporation Employees (Special Power) Ordinance (XIII of 1978), S.3‑‑Leave to appeal sought on grounds (i) whether order of appointment made to operate retrospectively would attract provisions of S.3 of Ordinance; (ii) whether application of said Ordinance was lawful in facts of the case, and (iii) whether evidence relied upon by High Court concerning petitioners appointment as an apprentice could be used to sustain an order under S.3 of Ordinance‑‑Leave to appeal having been granted in another case involving similar, points, leave also granted in the case. Dated hearing: 2nd February, 1987.
Judgment & Decree
MIAN BURHANUDDIN KHAN, J.‑‑ By this petition leave is sought to appeal against the judgment and order dated 24‑11‑1986 passed by a learned Single Judge of the Lahore High Court, Lahore in Writ Petition No. 3109 of 1979 on the following grounds:‑ (i)Whether the order of appointment, made to operate retrospectively, shall be deemed to have been made from the previous date so as to attract the provisions of section 3 of the Corporation Employees (Special Powers) Ordinance, 1978; (ii) Whether application of the aforesaid Ordinance is. at all, lawful in the facts of the instant case; and (iii) Whether the evidence relied upon by the learned High Court Judge concerning petitioner's appointment as an apprentice, could be used to sustain an order under section which affected the permanent appointment of the petitioner, ordered after about two years of apprenticeship.
2. We have already granted leave in Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No.1036 of 1986. As similar points are involved in this petition, we, therefore, grant leave in his petition, which shall be heard alongwith the abovesaid C.P.L.A. No.1036. Appeal to be heard on the present record with liberty to the parties to file additional documents, if desired. S.Q./T‑3/S Leave granted.