2001 PLC61 (PLP)
MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE Versus SHAHEEN AIRPORT SERVICE through Manager Administration and another
| Citation | 2001 PLC61 (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | National Industrial Relations Commission |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Hussain Chaudhry, Member |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE Versus SHAHEEN AIRPORT SERVICE through Manager Administration and another |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2001 PLC61 (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2001 PLC61 (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the National Industrial Relations Commission bench comprising: Muhammad Hussain Chaudhry, Member.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2001 PLC61 (PLP) (MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE Versus SHAHEEN AIRPORT SERVICE through Manager Administration and another). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- M. Siddique Malik, Representative for Petitioner.
- S.M. Yaqoob for Respondents.
Headnotes / Summary
Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969)‑‑‑‑ ‑‑‑‑Ss.22‑A(8)(g) & 25‑A‑‑‑Petition before National Industrial Relations Commission‑‑‑ Competency‑‑‑Agitating grievance before two forums simultaneously‑‑‑Effect‑‑‑Pending grievance petition before Labour Court under S.25‑A of Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969, petitioner/employee filed petition before National Industrial Relations Commission, under S.22‑A(8)(g) of the Ordinance‑‑‑Validity‑‑‑Agitating grievance before two forums simultaneously on same cause of action was not permissible‑‑ Petitioner having already challenged his dismissal before Labour Court, petition before National Industrial Relations Commission had become infructuous and was liable to be dismissed accordingly.
Judgment & Decree
Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969)‑‑‑‑ ‑‑‑‑Ss.22‑A(8)(g) & 25‑A‑‑‑Petition before National Industrial Relations Commission‑‑‑ Competency‑‑‑Agitating grievance before two forums simultaneously‑‑‑Effect‑‑‑Pending grievance petition before Labour Court under S.25‑A of Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969, petitioner/employee filed petition before National Industrial Relations Commission, under S.22‑A(8)(g) of the Ordinance‑‑‑Validity‑‑‑Agitating grievance before two forums simultaneously on same cause of action was not permissible‑‑ Petitioner having already challenged his dismissal before Labour Court, petition before National Industrial Relations Commission had become infructuous and was liable to be dismissed accordingly. M. Siddique Malik, Representative for Petitioner. S.M. Yaqoob for Respondents. One Muhammad Siddique has filed this petition under section 22‑A(8)(g) of the I.R.O., 1969 against the respondents with prayer to restrain the respondents from taking any adverse action in respect of employment of the applicant including transfer, discharge, dismissal, retirement, demotion, revision disadvantage in bona fide or otherwise punished during the pendency of the case and to take cognizance against the respondents for having committed acts of unfair labour practice.
2. Alongwith main petition, application under Regulation 32(2)(c) of N.I.R.C. (P&F) Regulations, 1^73 supported by affidavit, has also been filed by the petitioner for interim relief.
3. It is admitted feature of the case that petitioner Muhammad Siddique has been dismissed from employment and he has taken resource under section 24‑A of the I.R.O., 1969 to the Labour Court where the case of the petitioner is pending. It is settled law that nobody can be allowed to agitate his grievance before two forums simultaneously on the same cause of action. Since the petitioner has challenged his dismissal before the Labour Court this petition has become infrutuous which is hereby dismissed accordingly. H. B. T./11/NIRC Petition dismissed.