YLR 2006

2006 PLP 3116 (YLR)

HASAN SOHAIL — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Jurisdiction / Court
Karachi
Decided Date
Criminal Bail Application No.669 and M.As.2403 to 2405 of 2005, decided on 19th July, 2005.
Honorable Judges
Amir Hani Muslim, J
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 2006 PLP 3116 (YLR)
Forum / Court Karachi
Bench Members Amir Hani Muslim, J
Parties HASAN SOHAIL — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent
Primary Law Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2006 PLP 3116 (YLR)?

This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2006 PLP 3116 (YLR)?

The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: Amir Hani Muslim, J.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 2006 PLP 3116 (YLR) (HASAN SOHAIL — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

Headnotes / Summary

S. 498

Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.337-A(i), 504, 506, 147 & 148

Bail before arrest, grant of

Counsel of applicant stated that the applicant on whose behalf bail application was filed, was out of country and he (counsel) had been instructed over phone to move the bail application on his behalf; that applicant was of 19 years of age and that applicant's name had been placed on the Exit Control List and the moment he would land he would be arrested

Validity

High Court, without touching the merits of the case, granted protective bail to the applicant for a period of fifteen days

Bail application of accused was disposed of with specific directions. Aamir Mansoob Qureshi for Applicant.

Judgment & Decree

AMIR HANI MUSLIM, J.--Deferred as according to learned counsel, the applicant, on whose behalf the bail application has been filed, is out of country and he has been instructed over phone to move the bail application on his behalf.

2. Granted.

3. Granted but subject to all just exceptions. 4 and

5. It has been contended by learned counsel that the alleged incident took place on 23-6-2005 and the F.I.R. was lodged on 30-6-2005 with Clifton Police Station. The applicant left Karachi for UAE on 1-7-2005. The applicant, according to learned counsel, is of 19 years age. Learned counsel further states that the applicant's name has been placed on the Exit Control List and the moment he will land he will be arrested. I have heard learned counsel and perused the record very carefully. Without touching the merits of the case, applicant is granted protective bail for a period of fifteen days in the sum of Rs.100,000 (one hundred thousand) with P.R. bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Nazir of this Court. The period of protective bail shall come to an end on August 3, 2005, or earlier if the applicant surrenders before the learned trial/ concerned Court, whichever is earlier. This order shall not influence the trial Court in any manner. A copy of this order be communicated to the TPO Clifton, Karachi and concerned S.P. Investigation for information. This bail application stands disposed of in the above terms. H.B.T./H-16/K??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? Order accordingly.