2016 P Cr (PLP)
AFSAR ALI — Petitioner Versus The STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 2016 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Peshawar |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | AFSAR ALI — Petitioner Versus The STATE — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2016 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2016 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Peshawar bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2016 P Cr (PLP) (AFSAR ALI — Petitioner Versus The STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Arshad Hussain Yousafzai for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 497(2)
Emigration Ordinance (XVIII of 1979), S.17
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.420 & 468
Passports Act (XX of 1974), S.6
Running illegal Travel Agency, cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property, forgery for purpose of cheating, possessing forged documents
Allegation against accused was that he was found running illegal travel agency
Accused, could not produce any valid licence and raid of police led to the recovery of Pakistani Passports, other documents meant required for travelling abroad
Whether accused was owner of the travel agency, or he was chance visitor to the same was yet to be seen
Possession of a forged document, was not an offence, unless it was proved that same had been prepared or used with active connivance of a person
Knowledge of accused qua falsity or genuineness of the Passports, was a question to be determined after recording evidence, but accused could not be kept behind the bars for indefinite period when commencement of the trial was not in sight
Punishment provided in offences for which accused was charged, did not fall within the prohibitory limb of S.497, Cr.P.C.
Grant of bail in circumstances, was a rule, and refusal an exception
On tentative assessment of material, case of accused required further probe
Judgment & Decree
MUSARRAT HILALI, J.
Petitioner, through petition in hand, seeks bail in case FIR No.1 dated 5.1.2016 registered for offence under section 17, Emigration Ordinance, 1979, 420/468, P.P.C. read with section 6, Passports Act by Police Station FIA/A.H.T.C. Mardan.
2. As per information received by Mr. Hidayat, Assistant Director FIA regarding running of illegal travel agency by petitioner, thus, acting on the same the complainant along with other police nafri raided the said travel agency, who on inquiry could not produce any valid license. In presence of petitioner, search of the travel agency was carried out, which led to the recovery of 4 Pakistani Passports along with other documents pertaining to Malaysia, Medical Certificate and signed empty Polio Card, hence the case was registered against him.
3. Heard. In instant case, allegation against the petitioner is that he was found running illegal travel agency and when raid was conducted, he could not produce any valid license to the raiding party, which led to the recovery of 4 Pakistani Passports, other documents meant for Malaysia and signed empty Polio Card. It is yet to be seen whether the petitioner is owner of the travel agency or he was chance visitor to the same. Further, the possession of a forged document is not an offence unless it is proved that the same had been prepared or used with active connivance of a person. The knowledge of petitioner qua fakeness or genuineness of the Passports is a question to be determined after recording evidence but till that stage comes, he cannot be kept behind the bars for indefinite period and that too when commencement of the trial is not in sight. Again, the punishment provided in offences for which the petitioner is charged do not fall within the prohibitory limb of section 497, Cr.P.C., therefore, in such circumstances grant of bail is a rule and refusal an exception. On tentative assessment of material, case of the petitioner requires further probe. This petition was allowed vide short order of even date and above are reasons for the same. HBT/203/P Bail granted.