1988 PLP 1359 (SCMR)
Ch. NAZIR AHMAD — Petitioner Versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE III, SAHIWAL and others Respondents
| Citation | 1988 PLP 1359 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Javid Iqbal and Saad Saood Jan, JJ |
| Parties | Ch. NAZIR AHMAD — Petitioner Versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE III, SAHIWAL and others Respondents |
| Primary Law | Guardians and Wards Act (VIII of 1890) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1988 PLP 1359 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Guardians and Wards Act (VIII of 1890) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1988 PLP 1359 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Javid Iqbal and Saad Saood Jan, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1988 PLP 1359 (SCMR) (Ch. NAZIR AHMAD — Petitioner Versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE III, SAHIWAL and others Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Nemo for Respondents Nos.l, 2, 4 and 5.
- Zakiuddin Pal, Senior Advocate Supreme Court, instructed by Mahmood Ahmad Qureshi Advocate-on-Record for Petitioner.
- Malik Muhammad Qayyum, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Rana M.A.Qadri, Advocate-on-Record for Respondent No.3.
- Date of hearing: 20th April, 1988.
- Zakiuddin Pal, Senior Advocate Supreme Court, instructed by Mahmood Ahmad Qureshi Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
- Malik Muhammad Qayyum, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Rana M.A.Qadri, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondent No.3.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the judgment and order of the Lahore High Court Bahawalpur Bench dated 23rd May, 1987 in Writ Petition No.1166 of 1980").
S.25--Custody of child--Welfare of minor girl, living with aged maternal-grandparents--Petitioner seeking custody of his daughter aged 14 years--Girl residing with her maternal-grandparents since childhood--Petitioner, after separation remarried and had children from second wife--Mother also remarried and living with her second husband--Petitioner claiming that child's maternal-grandparents being too old were not in a proper condition to look after the minor nor give her proper education--Child apparently intelligent, refuting the allegation and categorically stating that since she had been from her childhood brought up by her maternal-grandparents, she would stay with them and not with petitioner who had been a constant cause of disturbance for her--Custody of minor allowed to remain with maternal grandmother.
Judgment & Decree
JAVID IQBAL, J.‑‑This petition for leave to appeal has been filed by Ch. Nazir Ahmad petitioner claiming custody of his minor daughter from respondents Nos.3 to
5. Mst.Farzana, his daughter is at present residing with her maternal‑grandmother. The parties came to an interim settlement which has been reduced into writing and placed on record. An order was therefore, passed on 8th December, 1987 in this case and the case was adjourned for one month to enable the parties to work out the arrangements successfully. Thereafter vide our order dated 18th January, 1988 the present interim arrangements were ordered to continue for another period of three months. Now an application has been filed on behalf of the petitioner praying that respondents 3 to 5 may be submitted to medical examination. It is stated in the application that the High Court gave the custody of Mst.Farzana to her maternal‑grandparents who were too old, infirm and feeble to look after the minor girl. The maternal grandmother of the minor was more than 80 years old and her maternal‑grandfather was aged between 85 to 90 years. It was submitted that they were not in proper condition to look after the minor. Today before us were present Mst.Farzana, her maternal‑grandmother as well as maternal‑uncle. On the other side the petitioner‑father Ch.Nazir Ahmad was also present along with his learned counsel. The position is that Ch.Nazir Ahmad petitioner was married to the mother of Mst.Farzana and this marriage broke up and the petitioner divorced his wife who came along with Mst.Farzana, while she was a small child, to live with her parents. Afterwards the petitioner remarried and has now children from his second wife. They are living with the petitioner. On the other side the mother of Mst.Farzana had also got remarried and is living with her husband. Minor Farzana is thus living with her grand parents and maternal‑uncles as well as their wives. She appears to be aged about 14 years now and studies in the sixth class of a Convent school. She appears to be an intelligent girl. We asked her if she would be willing to reside with her father but she categorically stated that since she had been from her childhood brought up by her maternal‑grandparents she would only like to stay with them and not with the petitioner. The petitioner before us levelled the allegation that not only the maternal‑grandparents were old and infirm and could not look after her but they make her work in their house as a servant and did not give her proper education. In reply Mst.Farzana told us that these allegations were false. She did not work as a servant in her maternal‑grandparents' house but regularly went to school and that furthermore if she was lagging behind in her studies it was only because the petitioner has been a constant disturbance for her. We have heard learned counsel for the parties. In the light of what has been stated above, in our considered opinion the custody of Mst.Farzana should remain with her maternal‑grandmother as ordered by the Lahore High Court Bahawalpur Bench vide judgment dated 23rd May, 1987 in Writ Petition No.1166 of 1986/BWP. This petition is consequently dismissed. M.I./N‑72/S Petition dismissed.