1989 PLP 126 (PLC)
FAIZ AHMAD Versus PUNJAB GOVERNMENT and 2 others
| Citation | 1989 PLP 126 (PLC) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore High Court |
| Bench Members | Irshad Hasan Khan, J |
| Parties | FAIZ AHMAD Versus PUNJAB GOVERNMENT and 2 others |
| Primary Law | Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXI11 of 1969)‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1989 PLP 126 (PLC)?
This judgment primarily cites: Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXI11 of 1969)‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1989 PLP 126 (PLC)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore High Court bench comprising: Irshad Hasan Khan, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1989 PLP 126 (PLC) (FAIZ AHMAD Versus PUNJAB GOVERNMENT and 2 others). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑‑S. 25‑A‑‑Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 199‑‑Constitutional jurisdiction, exercise of‑‑Parties arrived at a compromise outside the Court and recorded their statements as to factum of compromise‑‑Constitutional petition was accepted and decided in the light of statements of the parties.
Judgment & Decree
‑‑‑S. 25‑A‑‑Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 199‑‑Constitutional jurisdiction, exercise of‑‑Parties arrived at a compromise outside the Court and recorded their statements as to factum of compromise‑‑Constitutional petition was accepted and decided in the light of statements of the parties. By Order dated 11‑11‑1988 the case was adjourned to enable the parties to explore the possibility of settling the dispute outside the Court. Mr. Abaidullah, General Manager of the respondent‑bank has prepared various statements of salaries for the relevant period. Let his statement be recorded. Statement of Mr. Abaidullah, General Manager, Punjab Provincial Co operative Bank Ltd., The Mall, Lahore on SA. The bank made an offer to the petitioner for re‑employment by its letter dated 2‑4‑1984 according to which he was entitled to back benefits from 14‑10‑1982 but not to conveyance and other benefits like bonus and leave salary (Exh. R/1.). The petitioner did not accept the offer. The bank is now prepared to pay to the petitioner Rs.78,000 in full and final settlement of his previous salary (Exh.R/1‑A). The bank is also prepared to re‑employ him from the date he joins, as new entrant. The gratuity and pension admissible to the petitioner on the basis of service already served before dismissal of his appeal by the Supreme Court and subsequently will be decided by the bank in accordance with the relevant Service Rules. This will be without prejudice to the demand raised by the petitioner in his application dated 2‑8‑1986 (Exh. R.2). His application will be placed before the Board of Directors of the respondent‑bank in its next meeting scheduled to be held in next December for consideration. The petitioner will be afforded an opportunity of being heard by the Board or the sub‑committee constituted by the Board before any decision is taken against him. The amount as per that application comes to Rs.2,14,115, without bonus and with bonus Rs.2,54,
597. The statement is produced as Exh. R.3. Statement of Faiz Ahmad son of Ch. Sardar Muhammad, resident of House No. 26, Ishwar Street 82, Islampura, Lahore on SA. I have heard the statement of Mr. Abaidullah, General Manager of the respondent‑bank. I accept the offer made by him. The writ petition be decided in the light of the offer made by the General Manager which is acceptable to me. The parties have arrived at a compromise. The writ petition is, therefore, accepted in the light of the aforesaid statements which shall be read as part of this order. There shall, however, be no order as to costs. A.A./F‑97/L Petition accepted.