PCRLJ 1996

1996 P Cr (PLP)

MUHAMMAD ABBAS — Petitioner Versus S.H.O. and another — Respondents

Jurisdiction / Court
Lahore
Decided Date
1996-May-15
Honorable Judges
N/A
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1996 P Cr (PLP)
Forum / Court Lahore
Bench Members N/A
Parties MUHAMMAD ABBAS — Petitioner Versus S.H.O. and another — Respondents
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1996 P Cr (PLP)?

This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1996 P Cr (PLP)?

The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: N/A.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1996 P Cr (PLP) (MUHAMMAD ABBAS — Petitioner Versus S.H.O. and another — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Representation

  • Abdul Aziz Khan Niazi for Petitioner.

Headnotes / Summary

Art. 199

Constitutional petition

Illegal detention of accused

Detenu, no doubt, was nominated as an accused in an F.I.R. registered under S.454/380/411. P.P.C., but his arrest had neither been entered in the daily diary of the C.I.A. Staff where he was detained with an American Lock around his shin, nor shown in the Zimnis of the case

Detention of the detenu, in circumstances, was declared to be illegal for the time being and he was set at liberty

Investigating Officer, however, could arrest him in the case registered against him in accordance with law

Superintendent of Police concerned was also directed to hold an inquiry and take suitable action against the police officer found responsible for having committed the aforesaid illegal acts.

Judgment & Decree

2. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner, a bailiff of this Court was appointed on 14-5-1996 to effect the recovery of Riaz Ahmad detenu from C.I.A. Staff, Vehari. It was submitted that Maqbool Hussain, A.S.-I. has kept the said detenu in illegal custody in the premises of C.I.A. Staff, Vehari.

3. The bailiff visited C.I.A. Staff, Vehari on 14-5-1996 and introduced himself to Sultan Mehmood, Moharrir C.I.A. Staff, and took into possession the daily diary. He made search and found Riaz Ahmad detenu locked in the room of the C.I.A. Staff, Vehari with an American lock around his shin.

4. Today Maqbool Hussain, A.S.-I., Anwar Jameel, Bailiff and Riaz Ahmad, detenu are present in the Court.

5. Maqbool Hussain, A.S.-I. states that Riaz Ahmad is nominated accused in case F.I.R. No.336/95 dated 26-10-1995 under sections 454, 380/411, A P.P.C. of Police Station, Sadar, Vehari and was absconder for the last six months, the recovery of stolen money is also to be made and some respectable produced the detenu before him on 14-5-1996 in the evening.

6. Anwar Jameel Bailiff could not find out any entry in the daily diary of the C. I. A. Staff about the arrest of Riaz Ahmad detenu. So much so, that his 8 arrest was not shown in the Zimnis of the case.

7. Riaz Ahmad, detenu stated that he was arrested on 5-5-1996 from the premises of Sessions Court, Vehari when his bail petition was rejected. Further stated that he was not produced before any competent Court and no physical remand was taken. The bailiff reported that he saw another Riaz Ahmad son of Cheragh Din tied with the same rod having American lock around his shin. In the meanwhile Maqbool Hussain, A.S.-I. reached the C.I.A. Staff building and he refused to hand over the American lock to him.

8. I have considered all the circumstances of this case and found that doubt, Riaz Ahmad detenu is nominated accused of F.I.R. No.336/95 but the fact remains that an Investigating Officer is to perform his duties in accordance the with law. Maqbool Hussain, A.S.-I. is unable to explain who ordered to put the American lock around the shin of the detenu and another Riaz Ahmad abovementioned. The life and liberty of a person is protected by the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973 and the same can be curtailed strictly in accordance with law. I am at loss to understand if detenu was produced by some respectable in the C.I.A. Staff, shortly before arrival of the bailiff as contended by A.S.-I. then why the American lock was put around his shin. Prima facie Maqbool Hussain, A.S.-I., C.I.A. Staff, Vehari has committed illegal act and the detention of Riaz Ahmad, brother of the petitioner is illegal.

9. For what has been stated above, I direct S.P., Vehari to hold inquiry into the circumstances which led to the filing of this habeas petition and to fix responsibility upon the delinquent, who without any lawful authority kept Riaz Ahmad in illegal detention and put American lock round his shin. He shall take suitable action against a person/officials found guilty after the investigation and he shall report to the D.R.(J) about the action taken by him in this respect within three weeks of the receipt of this order. The office is directed to transmit this order immediately to S. P. concerned.

10. As I have declared the detention of the detenu Riaz Ahmad illegal for the time being, he is set at liberty. However, Investigating Officer may arrest him in accordance with law. The Investigating Officer is also directed to complete the investigation of the case at the earliest. Rs.1.700 be returned to the petitioner after deducting Rs.300, the expenditure of the bailiff', from the security deposited.

11. With these orders, this petition stands disposed of. N.H.Q./M-112/L???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? Petition allowed.