P L D 1999 Lahore 454 (PLP)
Dr. LIAQAT ALI — Appellant Versus VICE-CHANCELLOR, UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURE,
| Citation | P L D 1999 Lahore 454 (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | |
| Bench Members | Malik Muhammad Qayyum |
| Parties | Dr. LIAQAT ALI — Appellant Versus VICE-CHANCELLOR, UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURE, |
| Primary Law | Educational institution |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in P L D 1999 Lahore 454 (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: Educational institution as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case P L D 1999 Lahore 454 (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the bench comprising: Malik Muhammad Qayyum.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: P L D 1999 Lahore 454 (PLP) (Dr. LIAQAT ALI — Appellant Versus VICE-CHANCELLOR, UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURE,). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Ahmad Nawaz Wattoo for Appellant
- Kh. Abdul Hamid Butt for Respondents
- Date of hearing: 25th May, 1999.
Headnotes / Summary
Admission in M.Sc.
Candidate applied for admission in M.Sc. in University of Agriculture which admission was denied to him on ground that he had failed to obtain his nomination from Northern Areas
Candidate, after obtaining nomination from Northern Areas filed Constitutional petition against denial of admission to him by University of Agriculture
Pending Constitutional petition, High Court granted interim relief whereby University Authorities were directed to grant admission to the candidate provisionally till final decision of the Constitutional petition
Constitutional petition filed by candidate was though dismissed, but during the period the Constitutional petition remained pending, candidate, who was granted provisional admission had completed his course of M.Sc.
Effect
Held, it would be inequitable and harsh at such stage to adjudicate the entitlement of candidate for admission and give finding against him
Without touching eligibility of candidate for admission on merits, High Court allowed Intra-Court Appeal of candidate holding that admission and completion of study under interim order of High Court should be taken as legal. 1997 SCMR 1845 ref.
Judgment & Decree
GHULAM MAHMOOD QURESHI, J.--The appellant after passing his D.V.M. course in 1996 from the College of Veterinary Sciences, Lahore, applied for admission in M.Sc. Course on 15-11-1996 in University of Agriculture Faisalabad. He obtained 2284 marks out of 3860 and the C.G.P.A. is 2.59 in D.V.M. Course. The above said college is affiliated with the University of Agriculture, Faisalabad. The admission was denied to the appellant on the ground that he had failed to obtain his nomination from Northern Area. Whereafter he proceeded to Gilgit (Northern Area) to get nomination as a student from that area, which was issued to him on 21-3-1997. The appellant filed Writ Petition No.3000 of 1997 challenging the action of the University Authorities about denial of his admission, which was dismissed on 7-12-1998. Hence this appeal.
2. Vide interim order of this Court dated 11-2-1997 the respondent was directed- to give the appellant admission on provisional basis. The said interim order of this Court was made subject to final decision of writ petition filed by the appellant. Finally the writ petition was dismissed vide order dated 7-12-1998.
3. Admittedly the appellant has completed his course. The learned counsel for appellant has relied on 1997 SCMR 1845 to contend that -in similar circumstances, Hon'ble Supreme Court of Pakistan did not interfere to undo the admission. In the reported casetha affected person had completed four years course of M.B.,B.S. under interim order.
4. The learned counsel for the University has conversely contended that since the admission was allowed to the petitioner provisionally and was subject to final decision of his Constitutional petition, which was finally dismissed, therefore, the appellant cannot take benefit of interim order, when his writ petition has finally been dismissed.
5. Since the appellant was admitted under an interim order of this Court and has completed his study, at this stage, it would be inequitable and harsh to adjudicate the entitlement of the appellant for admission and give finding against him. Without touching his eligibility for admission on merit and respectfully following the dictum laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in above said case, we are inclined to hold that the admission and completion of study under the interim order of this Court should be taken as legal for that purpose. This L-C.A. is allowed. No order as to costs. H.B.T./L-45/L I.-C.A. allowed.