MLD 1995

1995 PLP 1138 (MLD)

IDARA TEHRIK‑E‑QANOON ‑‑‑ Petitioner Versus SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB and. others‑‑‑Respondents

Jurisdiction / Court
Lahore
Decided Date
Writ Petition No. 10955 and Civil Miscellaneous Application No. 1 of 1994, decided on 21st September, 1994.
Honorable Judges
Muhammad Arif, J
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1995 PLP 1138 (MLD)
Forum / Court Lahore
Bench Members Muhammad Arif, J
Parties IDARA TEHRIK‑E‑QANOON ‑‑‑ Petitioner Versus SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB and. others‑‑‑Respondents
Primary Law Registration of Printing Press and Publications Ordinance (III of 1990)‑‑‑
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1995 PLP 1138 (MLD)?

This judgment primarily cites: Registration of Printing Press and Publications Ordinance (III of 1990)‑‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1995 PLP 1138 (MLD)?

The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Muhammad Arif, J.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1995 PLP 1138 (MLD) (IDARA TEHRIK‑E‑QANOON ‑‑‑ Petitioner Versus SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB and. others‑‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Registration of Printing Press and Publications Ordinance (III of 1990)‑‑‑

Representation

  • Dr. A. Basit for Petitioner,

Headnotes / Summary

‑‑‑‑S. 37‑‑‑Registration of Printing Press and Publications Ordinance (XIII of 1990), S.37‑‑‑West Pakistan Press and Publications Ordinance (XXX of 1963), Ss. 2(3) & 7‑‑‑Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 199‑‑‑Publication of journal titled "legal opinion"‑‑‑Authority advising plaintiff (Idara) that such journal indicated periodicity as quarterly and Vol. I, and same fell under S.2(3), West Pakistan Press and Publications Ordinance, 1963, therefore, petitioner was required to file declaration under S.7 of the Ordinance of 1963, which piece of legislation as asserted by Authority was in force after the lapse of the Ordinances viz. Registration of Printing Press and Publications Ordinance (III of 1990) and its subsequent version viz. XIII of 1990‑‑‑Validity‑‑‑Petitioner claimed that both Ordinances viz. Registration of Printing Press and Publications Ordinance (III of 1990) and its subsequent version i.e. (XIII of 1990), had lapsed by efflux of time and that West Pakistan Press and Publications Ordinance had professedly been repealed under both the Ordinances of 1990, with the result that only action pending under the Repealed Act, 1963, were saved then and even the same situation would remain current after the lapse of the latest Ordinance viz. (XIII of 1990)‑‑ Petitioner's contention was that there being no law in existence which required the Printer and Publisher of a book/journal to get a declaration from the Authority requirement of declaration by the Authority was beyond the confines of its jurisdiction‑‑‑Contentions raised needed examination‑‑‑Constitutional petition was admitted in circumstances.

Judgment & Decree

Dr. A. Basit for Petitioner, Petitioner‑Idara served a Legal Notice on the Secretary Home Department, Government of the Punjab, Secretary, Information Department, Government of the Punjab and Director, Public Relations, Punjab on 14‑6‑1994 through Dr. A. Basit, Advocate, and Editor of the "Legal Opinion". The Idara had already submitted four copies of the book "Legal Opinion" in terms of section 37 of the Registration of Printing Press and Publications Ordinance (No III of 1990), and had contended that as the Idara was not under any legal duty to submit these copies in that the Ordinance of 1990 had lapsed but still the requirement thereunder from the Author of any book for seeking a "Declaration" in that regard was being treated as extent by the respondent -authorities in the Directorate of Public Relations. The Idara required the addressees of the notice to "quote the law under which you are requiring the Printer to seek the Declaration. You may also quote the provision on the basis of which you are treating the subject Book as a Newspaper." It further put the addresses of the notice under threat that in the event of their failure to do the needful in terms of the notice dated 14‑6‑1994 within "three clear days", the Editor shall have no option but to approach the Court of law to obtain an appropriate direction for restraining the addressees of the notice"... from threatening the Printer of the aforesaid Book with penal consequences".

2. After having received the notice dated 14‑6‑1994, the Directorate General, Public Relations, Government of the Punjab Press Laws Branch, sent their reply thereto contending that the publication of Journal titled "Legal Opinion", which does indicate the periodicity as Quarterly and volume‑1 "which falls under section 2(3) of the West Pakistan Press and Publication Ordinance, 1963." The petitioner‑Idara was further advised by the respondent -authorities to file fresh Declaration under section 7 of the West Pakistan Press and Publications Ordinance, 1963 asserting in the reply afore-referred that this piece of legislation is in force, presently.

3. The Idara has made the instant petition of obtaining an injunctive order against the respondents from initiating any penal action against the Printer/s of the Journal titled "Legal Opinion" and for issuance of a writ order in the nature of certiorari for quashing the impugned order dated 15‑8‑1994".

4. It is inter alia, contended that both the Ordinances Nos. III and XIII of 1990 had lapsed by efflux of time; that the West Pakistan Press and Publications Ordinance (W.P. Ordinance No. XXX of 1963) had professedly been repealed, both under the Registration of Printing Press and Publications Ordinance No. III and Ordinance No. XIII of same nomenclature and both of the year of 1990 with the result that only actions pending under the West Pakistan Press and Publications Ordinance, 1963 were saved then and even the same situation would remain current after the lapse of the latest Ordinance namely ordinance (No. XIII of) 1990. The precise contention is that there is no law in existence which requires the Printer or Publisher of a book to get a "Declaration" from the respondent Authorities, and therefore, the treat extended to the petitioner‑Idara by the respondents in their letter dated 15‑8‑1994 is beyond the confines of their jurisdiction.

5. The contentions raised need examination. Admit. Notice.

6. Subject to notice for some early date, the operation of the impugned letter dated 15‑8‑1994 is suspended. AA./I‑130/L Constitutional petition admitted.