PCRLJ 1987

1987 P Cr (PLP)

ABDUL HAMID‑‑Appellant Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent

Jurisdiction / Court
Lahore
Decided Date
Criminal Appeal No. 19 of 1986, decided on 8th February, 1986.
Honorable Judges
Muhammad Munir Khan, J
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1987 P Cr (PLP)
Forum / Court Lahore
Bench Members Muhammad Munir Khan, J
Parties ABDUL HAMID‑‑Appellant Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent
Primary Law Penal Code (XLV of 1860)‑‑
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1987 P Cr (PLP)?

This judgment primarily cites: Penal Code (XLV of 1860)‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1987 P Cr (PLP)?

The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Muhammad Munir Khan, J.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1987 P Cr (PLP) (ABDUL HAMID‑‑Appellant Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Penal Code (XLV of 1860)‑‑

Representation

  • M. Aslam Riaz for Petitioner.

Headnotes / Summary

‑‑‑Ss. 463 to 468‑‑Forgery‑‑Ingredients‑‑Recording false note, whether constitutes forgery‑‑Recording false note on application for allotment would not constitute forgery‑‑A false note was recorded by accused on an application to the effect that applicant was an allottee of plot of land, although there was no allotment order‑‑Allegation against accused that he recorded a false note, held, would not fall within definition of forgery under 5.463, P.P.C. punishable under S. 468, Penal Code. Muhammad Zafar Yasin for the State.

Judgment & Decree

4. When examined under section 342, Cr.P.C. the appellant denied all the incriminating circumstances.

5. The learned counsel for the appellant mainly contended that the allegations as well as the findings of the learned trial Court that the appellant had made a wrong note on the application of Mst. Zainab Bibi that she was allottee of plot of land, does not amount to forgery punishable under section 468, P.P.C. The learned counsel for the State has not been able to controvert him.

6. I have considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties with care. I feel persuaded to agree with the learned counsel for the appellant. The prosecution case is that Mst. Zainab Bibi P.W. 6 moved) application Exh. P.H. for allotment of plot in Kachi Abadi Factory Area to' the Secretary Housing Committee, Faisalabad. The petition was processed by Abdul Hameed appellant and that although there was no allotment order in the relevant file yet the appellant wrote a note on the application to the effect that she was allottee of the plot of land. I feel the allegations against the appellant does not fall within the definition of forgery under section 463, P.P.C. The relevant provisions may be reproduced conveniently:‑‑ SECTION 463, P.P.C. "Whoever makes any false document or part of document, with intent to cause damage or injury, to the public or to any person, or to support any claim or title, or to cause any person to part with property, or to enter into any express or implied contract, with intent to commit fraud or that fraud may be committed, commits forgery:" SECTION 464, P.P.C.: "A person is said to make a false document:‑‑ First. Who dishonestly or fraudulently makes, signs, seals or executes a document or part of a document, or makes any mark denoting the execution of a document, with the intention of causing it to be believed that such document or part of document was made, signed, sealed or executed by or by the authority of a person by whom or by whose authority he knows that it was not made, signed, sealed or executed; or Secondly. Who without lawful authority dishonestly or fraudulently, by cancellation or otherwise, alters a document in any material part thereof, after it has been made or executed either by himself or by any other person, whether such person be living or dead at the time of such alteration; or Thirdly. Who dishonestly or fraudulently causes any person to sign, seal, execute or alter a document, knowing that such person by reason of unsoundness of mind or intoxication cannot, or that by reason of deception practised upon him, he does not know the contents of the document or the nature of the alteration:" It is very much obvious that giving of a false note on some application, does not amount to forgery punishable under section 468, P.P.C.

7. For what has been said above, the appeal is accepted and the appellant is acquitted of the charge. M.Y.H./A‑49/L??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? Appeal accepted.