2010 PLP 1520 (YLR)
MUHAMMAD FAYYAZ — Petitioner Versus THE STATE and another — Respondents
| Citation | 2010 PLP 1520 (YLR) |
| Forum / Court | Peshawar |
| Bench Members | Mazhar Alam Khan Miankhel, J |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD FAYYAZ — Petitioner Versus THE STATE and another — Respondents |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2010 PLP 1520 (YLR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2010 PLP 1520 (YLR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Peshawar bench comprising: Mazhar Alam Khan Miankhel, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2010 PLP 1520 (YLR) (MUHAMMAD FAYYAZ — Petitioner Versus THE STATE and another — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Alam Sher Afridi for Petitioner.
- Date of hearing: 6th November, 2009.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 497
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.489-F
Record had shown that certain disputes existed between the complainant and accused, because another F.I.R. was also registered against accused on the report of complainant
During course of submission before High Court, certain cash payments by accused to the complainant had also been admitted at the Bar
Facts of record had reflected that both accused and the complainant had some common business for which such dealing through cheques were made and presence of civil suit confirmed that very fact
Question whether cheque in question was dishonestly issued to the complainant was a fact, genuineness or otherwise of which had to be proved at the trial
Punishment for the offence provided for, did not come under the prohibitory clause of S.497, Cr.P.C., which would entitle accused to the grant of bail
Accused was released on bail, in circumstances. Matiullah Baloch for the State. Malak Aman Khan for the Complainant.
Judgment & Decree
MAZHAR ALAM KHAN MIANKHEL, J.
One Hisar Gul son of Gul Marjan moved an application dated 6-7-2009 to S.H.O. Police Station Khan Raziq Shaheed (Police Station Kabuli) for registration of the case under section 489-F, P.P.C. against Muhammad Fayyaz son of Nisar Ahmad resident of Gul Abad, Peshawar. The said application was inquired into under section 156(3), Cr.P.C. and a case vide F.I.R. No. 647 dated 9-9-2009 under section 489-F, P.P.C. was registered against the accused petitioner on the ground that the accused has dishonestly issued a cheque bearing No.225057 to him which was dishonoured from the bank. The accused petitioner after refusal of bail from the lower forums has filed the instant application for his release on bail.
2. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, perusal of the record reveals that there are certain disputes between the two i.e. the complainant and the present accused petitioner because another F.I.R. No.480 dated 19-6-2009 was also registered against the present accused on the report of complainant Hisar Gul. During the course of submissions before this Court, certain cash payments by the accused to the complainant have also been admitted at the Bar. Besides the registration of said two criminal cases, a recovery Suit No.225/1 registered on 21-7-2008 to the tune of Rs.5,55,000 on the basis of agreement deed dated 13-7-2005 was also pending adjudication in the Court of Civil Judge, Peshawar between the parties. All these facts reflect that both the accused and the complainant have some common business for which such dealings through cheques were made. The presence of civil suit also confirms this very fact. The question whether the said cheque was dishonestly issued to the complainant is fact, genuineness or otherwise of which has to be proved at the time of trial. The punishment for the offence provided for does not come under the prohibitory clause of section 497, Cr.P.C. which entitles the accused petitioner to the grant of bail.
3. So, in the light of observations made above, this bail petition (Criminal Miscellaneous No.1697 of 2009) is allowed and the petitioner shall be released on bail if he furnishes bail bond in the sum of Rs.200,000 (Rupees two lacs) with two sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of Illaqa Judicial Magistrate/ Magistrate on Duty. However, being tentative assessment in the case, this may not prejudice the mind of the trial Court. H.B.T./88/P Bail granted.