2003 PLP (C (PLC(CS))
Agha M. IKRAM KHAN Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN
| Citation | 2003 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore High Court |
| Bench Members | Nasim Sikandar, J |
| Parties | Agha M. IKRAM KHAN Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2003 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2003 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore High Court bench comprising: Nasim Sikandar, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2003 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) (Agha M. IKRAM KHAN Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Rashdeen Nawaz Kasuri for Petitioner.
- Date of hearing: 31st July, 2002.
Headnotes / Summary
Arts. 199 & 25
Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), S.2-A-- Constitutional petition
Petitioner who was retired General Manager Admn. of National Fertilizer Corporation, had prayed to be treated at par with the Federal and Provincial Government Servants for relief in payment of property tax by invoking provisions of Art. 25 of the Constitution-- Validity
Allowing exemption to an assessee of a Federal or Provincial levy, was the privilege of concerned Government
High Court in exercise of its Constitutional jurisdiction, could not require Federal or a Provincial Government to adopt a particular policy
Claim of petitioner was devoid of any force as employer Corporation was a body corporate which could be wound up at any time and its legal status was not much different from any public company limited by shares
Employees of a company could not be said to stand at par with civil servants employed by Federal or a Provincial Government
Mere fact that Railway employees were governed by a Board, would not by itself mean that they were not in the employment of Federal Government
Provisions of S.2-A of Service Tribunals Act, 1973 were specific and related to matters which could be taken to the Service Tribunal
Said provision of law would not make those categories of employees to be civil servants for other purposes.
Judgment & Decree
Arts. 199 & 25
Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), S.2-A-- Constitutional petition
Petitioner who was retired General Manager Admn. of National Fertilizer Corporation, had prayed to be treated at par with the Federal and Provincial Government Servants for relief in payment of property tax by invoking provisions of Art. 25 of the Constitution-- Validity
Allowing exemption to an assessee of a Federal or Provincial levy, was the privilege of concerned Government
High Court in exercise of its Constitutional jurisdiction, could not require Federal or a Provincial Government to adopt a particular policy
Claim of petitioner was devoid of any force as employer Corporation was a body corporate which could be wound up at any time and its legal status was not much different from any public company limited by shares
Employees of a company could not be said to stand at par with civil servants employed by Federal or a Provincial Government
Mere fact that Railway employees were governed by a Board, would not by itself mean that they were not in the employment of Federal Government
Provisions of S.2-A of Service Tribunals Act, 1973 were specific and related to matters which could be taken to the Service Tribunal
Said provision of law would not make those categories of employees to be civil servants for other purposes. Rashdeen Nawaz Kasuri for Petitioner. Date of hearing: 31st July, 2002. Through this Constitutional petition the petitioner a retired General Manager Admn. of National Fertilizer Corporation prayed to be treated at par with Federal and Provincial Government Servants for relief in payment of property tax by invoking the provisions of Article 25 of the Constitution of Pakistan. It is pointed out that recently even the Railway employees have eligible for grant of the aforesaid relief which was being declined to the petitioner and other employee of Government controlled organizations.
2. After hearing the learned counsel I am not inclined to entertain the petition. Allowing exemption to an assessee of a Federal or Provincial levy is the privilege of the concerned Government. This Court in exercise of Constitutional jurisdiction cannot require the Federal or a Provincial Government to adopt a particular policy. The claim of the petitioner that as a retired employee of National Fertilizer Corporation he stands at par with the Federal or Provincial Government Employees is devoid of any force.
3. The aforesaid Corporation is a body corporate which can be wound up at any time and its legal status is not much different from any public company limited by shares. The employees of a Company cannot be said to stand at par with civil servants employees by the Federal or a Provincial Government. Mere fact treat the Railway employees are governed by a Board does not by itself mean that they are not in the employment of Federal Government. The provisions of section 2-A of the Federal Service Tribunals Act, 1973 are totally specific and relate only to the matters which can be carried to the Tribunal: That provision does not make these kinds of employees to be civil servants for other purposes.
4. Dismissal in limine. H.B.T./M-1980/L Petition dismissed.