1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))
ARSHAD MAHMOOD Versus SECRETARY EDUCATION
| Citation | 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) |
| Forum / Court | Service Tribunal Punjab |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Mehmud Aslam Pirzada, Chairman and Abdul Hamid Khan, Member |
| Parties | ARSHAD MAHMOOD Versus SECRETARY EDUCATION |
| Primary Law | Punjab Civil Servants (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules, 1975 |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?
This judgment primarily cites: Punjab Civil Servants (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules, 1975 as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?
The case was heard and decided by the Service Tribunal Punjab bench comprising: Muhammad Mehmud Aslam Pirzada, Chairman and Abdul Hamid Khan, Member.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) (ARSHAD MAHMOOD Versus SECRETARY EDUCATION). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Syed Akbar Bokhari for Appellant.
- Ch. Manzoor Hussain, D.A. for Respondent.
Headnotes / Summary
Rr. 4, 6 & 9
Civil servant who was dismissed from service on account of wilful absence from duty, had alleged that he had been dismissed from service without following procedure laid down in the Rules and without providing him sufficient opportunity of showing cause and his dismissal order was not passed by appointing Authority, but was passed by Authority which was not competent to do so
Allegations of civil servant having remained un-rebutted, Tribunal, set aside order of his dismissal and remanded case to initiate fresh proceedings strictly in accordance with law and decide case on merits after hearing civil servant.
Judgment & Decree
SECRETARY EDUCATION Appeal No. 776 of 1990, decided on 14th May, 1991.
Rr. 4, 6 & 9
Civil servant who was dismissed from service on account of wilful absence from duty, had alleged that he had been dismissed from service without following procedure laid down in the Rules and without providing him sufficient opportunity of showing cause and his dismissal order was not passed by appointing Authority, but was passed by Authority which was not competent to do so
Allegations of civil servant having remained un-rebutted, Tribunal, set aside order of his dismissal and remanded case to initiate fresh proceedings strictly in accordance with law and decide case on merits after hearing civil servant. Syed Akbar Bokhari for Appellant. Ch. Manzoor Hussain, D.A. for Respondent.