2007 PLP 161 (PTD)
MAPLE LEAF CEMENT FACTORY LTD. through Company Secretary Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Islamabad and 2 others
| Citation | 2007 PLP 161 (PTD) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi High Court |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Mujeebullah Siddiqui and Faisal Arab, JJ |
| Parties | MAPLE LEAF CEMENT FACTORY LTD. through Company Secretary Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Islamabad and 2 others |
| Primary Law | Customs Act (IV of 1969) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2007 PLP 161 (PTD)?
This judgment primarily cites: Customs Act (IV of 1969) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2007 PLP 161 (PTD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi High Court bench comprising: Muhammad Mujeebullah Siddiqui and Faisal Arab, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2007 PLP 161 (PTD) (MAPLE LEAF CEMENT FACTORY LTD. through Company Secretary Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Islamabad and 2 others). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Faisal Siddiqui for Petitioners (in all the three petitions).
- Salman Akram Raja for Petitioner (in C.P. No.D-1041 of 2006).
- Asghar Farooqui Standing Counsel for Respondent No. 1.
- Raja Muhammad Iqbal for Respondents Nos.2 and 3.
- After arguing the petitioners at some length, the learned Advocates for the petitioners and Mr. Raja Muhammad Iqbal, learned counsel for the Respondents Nos. 2 and 3 with the concurrence of learned Standing counsel and Mr. Jawaid Iqbal Butt, Deputy Collector of Customs and Yaseen Murtiza, Assistant Collector, AIB, have agreed that the petitions may be disposed of in the following terms:--
Headnotes / Summary
S. 19
S.R.O. 575(I)/2006, dated 5-6-2006
Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 199
Constitutional petition
Petitioner sought release of goods on payment of duty at 5% rate under S.R.O. 575(I)/2006, dated 5-6-2006, while authority demanded same at 30% rate
High Court disposed of constitutional petition with directions that petitioner, after being supplied assessment order, would deposit duty at 5% rate without objection and deposit 25% under protest without prejudice to his right to assail assessment order and application of rate of duty at 30%; that on deposit of duty at 30% rate in such manner, authority would release goods forthwith and petitioner would be at liberty to pursue his said plea in appeals before Appellate Authority and Tribunal, who would decided same within specified time; and that if petitioner succeeded finally in his plea, then duty paid in excess would be refunded to him within 15 days of his refund application.
Judgment & Decree
After arguing the petitioners at some length, the learned Advocates for the petitioners and Mr. Raja Muhammad Iqbal, learned counsel for the Respondents Nos. 2 and 3 with the concurrence of learned Standing counsel and Mr. Jawaid Iqbal Butt, Deputy Collector of Customs and Yaseen Murtiza, Assistant Collector, AIB, have agreed that the petitions may be disposed of in the following terms:-- (1) The petitioners shall be supplied the copies of the assessment orders by the respondents within three days. (2) After receiving the assessment order the petitioners shall deposit the customs duty at the rate of 5% without any objection and shall deposit remaining 25% under protest with the Customs Department without prejudice to their right of assailing assessment order and the application of rate of duty at 30%. (3) On deposit of customs duty at 30% and other taxes payable if any in accordance with the law, the respondents shall release the consignment forthwith if goods have not been released earlier in any petition. (4) The petitioners shall be at liberty to pursue their plea that they are required to pay customs duty at 5% under S.R.O. 575(I)/2006, dated 5-6-2006 and not at 30% and if so advised may prefer appeals against the assessment order before the Collector (Appeals) under section 193 of the Customs Act, within 30 days of the service of the assessment order as directed or may pursue any other remedy available to them under the law. (5) If any appeal is preferred under section 193 by the petitioners the Collector (Appeals) shall finally decide the appeal within one month of presentation of appeal before him. (6) If any party is aggrieved with the decision of Collector (Appeals) and prefers second appeal before the Customs? Excise and Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal, the Tribunal shall decide the appeal finally within a period of two months from the date of presentation of appeal before it. (7) If the petitioners finally succeed. In their plea and it is held that they are liable to pay the customs duty at the rate of 5% and not at 30% the differential amount of 25% shall be refunded to the petitioners within 15 days of submission of application for refund by the petitioners. The parties shall bear their own cost. The petitions stand disposed of in the above terms. All the listed applications have been rendered infructuous. S. A.K./M-143/K Order accordingly.