MLD 1999

1999 PLP 2554 (MLD)

RAMZAN — Petitioner Versus PROVINCE OF SINDH and others — Respondents

Jurisdiction / Court
Karachi
Decided Date
1997-March-25
Honorable Judges
N/A
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1999 PLP 2554 (MLD)
Forum / Court Karachi
Bench Members N/A
Parties RAMZAN — Petitioner Versus PROVINCE OF SINDH and others — Respondents
Primary Law Constitution of Pakistan (1973)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1999 PLP 2554 (MLD)?

This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1999 PLP 2554 (MLD)?

The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: N/A.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1999 PLP 2554 (MLD) (RAMZAN — Petitioner Versus PROVINCE OF SINDH and others — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Constitution of Pakistan (1973)

Representation

  • Naimatullah J. Qureshi for Petitioner.

Headnotes / Summary

Art. 199

Constitutional petition

Lease of Government land

Procedure and duty of Authorities

Petitioner had alleged that land of "Unarpur forest" was not granted to him by Authorities despite he was resident of village concerned and instead the said land was granted to respondent who was resident of other district on temporary cultivation lease

Petitioner had also alleged that land in dispute was leased out to respondent un-authorisedly at the behest of Minister who was relative of respondent

Validity

Where land, particularly Government land, was to be given on lease, procedure adopted by Authorities should be in consonance with principles of justice, equity and fairplay in bona fide manner

Lease of Government land should be given after proper advertisement and following principles of due process of law and every citizen had to be dealt with in accordance with law which was his unalienable right-- State functionaries while granting lease of Government land, were expected to act in a bona fide manner and their action must be transparent

If petitioner considered himself entitled for grant of land in dispute, he could apply to Authorities concerned who would consider his case in accordance with law and criteria mentioned above.

Judgment & Decree

ALI MUHAMMAD BALOCH, J.

These petitions have been filed under Article 199 of the Constitution of Islamic Republic. of Pakistan, 1973 praying the following relief:-- "(a) It may be declared that the petitioner is entitled for the grant of land (compartment No.38) of Unarpur Forest, Deh Unarpur, Taluka Kitri, District Dadu measuring 147 acres to the respondents Nos.1 and 2 be directed to pass necessary orders to that effect. (b) The cost of the petition be borne by the Respondents. (c) Any other relief, remedy deemed fit and appropriate in the circumstances of law be also awarded to the petitioner. Since in all the petitions, the point involved is same, therefore, they are disposed of by this common order.

2. The case set-forth by the petitioner in each petition is that he resides at village Unarpur while the respondent No.3 is original resident of District Jacobabad. According to him at the behest of Minister who had relationship with the respondent No.3 and influence, the forest land was given on temporary cultivation lease. The petitioner has stated that the lease given to respondent No.3 was illegal and politically motivated. It is the case of all petitioners that the lease in favour of the respondent No.3 was cancelled. According to the petitioners this order of cancellation has been assailed in another Constitutional petition. On our enquiry from the learned counsel for the petitioner under which provisions of Article 199 we can grant the belief as prayed by him, no answer was forthcoming. The authority of the respondent is embodid in law. It is expected that the respondents Nos.1 and 2 shall exercise their authority in such a manner which shall be transparent and crystal i.e. the procedure adopted must be in consonance with the principles of Islamic polity i.e. away from arbitrariness and closer to the fairness, equity, and justice. When the land is to be given on lease particularly Government land procedure adopted by the authorities should be A inconsonance with the principle of justice, equity and fair play in bona fide manner i.e. lease of Government should be given after proper advertisement and following the principles of due process of law and every citizen has to be dealt with in accordance with law which is his inalienable right. It is, therefore, expected that while granting lease of the Government land, the State functionary shall act in a bona fide manner and their actions must be transparent. We are clear that the petitioner is entitled for the grant of land as he may apply to the authority and if his case is found fit and in accordance with law, such case may be considered by the authorities on the basis and criteria mentioned supra. With these observations all these petitions are dismissed in limine H.B.T./R-67/K Petition dismissed.