CLC 2013

2013 PLP 762 (CLC)

ARIF NAWAZ — Petitioner Versus Mst. RABIA and another — Respondents

Jurisdiction / Court
Sindh
Decided Date
N/A
Honorable Judges
N/A
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 2013 PLP 762 (CLC)
Forum / Court Sindh
Bench Members N/A
Parties ARIF NAWAZ — Petitioner Versus Mst. RABIA and another — Respondents
Primary Law West Pakistan Family Courts Act (XXXV of 1964)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2013 PLP 762 (CLC)?

This judgment primarily cites: West Pakistan Family Courts Act (XXXV of 1964) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2013 PLP 762 (CLC)?

The case was heard and decided by the Sindh bench comprising: N/A.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 2013 PLP 762 (CLC) (ARIF NAWAZ — Petitioner Versus Mst. RABIA and another — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

West Pakistan Family Courts Act (XXXV of 1964)

Representation

  • Gulshan R. Dayo for Petitioner.

Headnotes / Summary

S. 10(4)

Constitution of Pakistan, Art.199

Constitutional petition

Failure of pre-trial proceedings

Power of Family Court to pass decree without examining witnesses

Scope

Plaintiff/wife had filed suit for dissolution of marriage (khula) and after pre-trial proceedings had failed, Family Court decreed her suit without examining any witnesses

Contentions of defendant/husband were that Family Court had not considered his written statement and decreed the suit of plaintiff/wife without examining any witnesses, and that his articles were still in possession of the plaintiff/wife

Validity

Family Court was empowered to decide the matter after failure of pre-trial proceedings without examining any witness

Defendant/husband could file a suit for recovery of his articles before the competent court of law

Constitutional petition was dismissed accordingly.

Judgment & Decree

HABIB-UR-REHMAN SHAIKH, J.

The petitioner has filed this petition challenging the order of Civil Judge and Family Judge-X, Hyderabad. The relevant paragraph of impugned order reproduced as under:

"keeping in mind the submission of parties made before me and in view relevant case-law and provisions of section 10(4) West Pakistan Family Courts Act, I, hereby declare the pretrial proceedings as failed. Accordingly the suit of the plaintiff is decreed. The marriage of plaintiff Mst. Rabia daughter of Allah Bachayo is dissolved with defendant Arif Nawaz son of Muhammad Nawaz by way of khula in lieu of her dower amount." Learned counsel contended that the Family Judge has not considered written statement and decreed the suit of the plaintiff without examining any witness and passed the judgment after failure of pre-trial in view of section 10(4) of the West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964. For the sake of convenience above section is reproduced below:

"10(4) If no compromise or reconciliation is possible, the court shall frame the issues in the case and fix a date for the recording of the evidence. Provided that notwithstanding any decision or judgment of any court or Tribunal, the Family Court in a suit for dissolution of marriage, if reconciliation fails, shall pass decree for dissolution of marriage forthwith and shall also restore to the husband the Haq Mehr received by the wife in consideration of marriage at the time of marriage". In the above mentioned section the Family Court is empowered to decide the matter after failure of pre-trial without examining any witness and the grievance of the petitioner is that his articles are still in possession of the respondent. The petitioner may file the suit for recovery of articles before the competent court of law and this petition is dismissed in limine. MWA/A-113/K Petition dismissed.