1980 PLP (C (PLC(CS))
ANWAR ALI Versus PROVINCE OF SIND AND OTHERS
| Citation | 1980 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) |
| Forum / Court | Service Tribunal Sind |
| Bench Members | Ghulam Rasool Shaikh, Chairman, Abdul Kadir and G. A. Mughal, Members |
| Parties | ANWAR ALI Versus PROVINCE OF SIND AND OTHERS |
| Primary Law | Sind Civil Servants Act (XIV of 1973)‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1980 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?
This judgment primarily cites: Sind Civil Servants Act (XIV of 1973)‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1980 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?
The case was heard and decided by the Service Tribunal Sind bench comprising: Ghulam Rasool Shaikh, Chairman, Abdul Kadir and G. A. Mughal, Members.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1980 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) (ANWAR ALI Versus PROVINCE OF SIND AND OTHERS). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Naimatullah for Appellant.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 13(i) read with Sind Service Tribunals Act (XV of 1974), S. 4-- Retirement on completion of 25 years' service‑‑‑Neither a penalty nor carries any stigma‑Competent authority sole judge to decide whether continuance after completion of 25 years service in public interest --Civil Servant retired under S. 13(i)‑‑‑Not an aggrieved person to invoke jurisdiction of Service Tribunal unless colourable exercise or abuse of power shown. P L D 1970 S C 98 rel.
Judgment & Decree
Appeal No. 6 of 1979, decided on 7th June 1979.
S. 13(i) read with Sind Service Tribunals Act (XV of 1974), S. 4-- Retirement on completion of 25 years' service‑‑‑Neither a penalty nor carries any stigma‑Competent authority sole judge to decide whether continuance after completion of 25 years service in public interest --Civil Servant retired under S. 13(i)‑‑‑Not an aggrieved person to invoke jurisdiction of Service Tribunal unless colourable exercise or abuse of power shown. P L D 1970 S C 98 rel. Naimatullah for Appellant. GHULAM RASOOL SHAIKH (CHAIRMAN).‑The appellant was retired under section 13(1) of the Sind Civil Servants Act, 1973. The contention that inquiry ought to have been held before the order of retirement has no basis. No such inquiry is necessary as the retirement under section 13(1) is neither removal from set vice nor it amounts to a penalty. Even reasons are not necessary. It does not carry any stigma. Authority competent to act alone is the judge whether it is in public interest to allow the civil,, servant to retire him on completion of 25 years service or allow him to continue till the age of retirement fixed from time to time. In fact he cannot be treated to be an aggrieved person. So appeal is not maintainable unless it can be shown that there is colourable exercise or abuse of power as has been held by the Supreme Court in the case reported in P L D 1970 S C 98. There is nothing on record to support any such accusation. Appeal is summarily dismissed. Appeal dismissed.