1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))
SAJJAD HAIDER KHAN Versus WAPDA through Chairman, WAPDA, Lahore
| Citation | 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) |
| Forum / Court | Federal Service Tribunal |
| Bench Members | Syed Ali Madad Shah, Chairman and Ch. Hasan Nawaz, Member |
| Parties | SAJJAD HAIDER KHAN Versus WAPDA through Chairman, WAPDA, Lahore |
| Primary Law | Civil service |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?
This judgment primarily cites: Civil service as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?
The case was heard and decided by the Federal Service Tribunal bench comprising: Syed Ali Madad Shah, Chairman and Ch. Hasan Nawaz, Member.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) (SAJJAD HAIDER KHAN Versus WAPDA through Chairman, WAPDA, Lahore). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Syed Jamshed Ali for Appellant.
- Ch. Ghulam Hassan Gulshan for Respondent.
- Date of hearing: 29th August, 1991.
Headnotes / Summary
Civil servant, who originally joined Electricity Department of the then West Pakistan Government in 1957 on work-charged basis, came to WAPDA in same capacity in consequence of en bloc transfer of employees of Provincial Electricity Department in 1959
WAPDA Authority, could not produce definite order with regard to absorption of civil servant in WAPDA
In absence of such order which could show fresh appointment of civil servant in WAPDA, civil servant would be deemed to have continued his service in WAPDA as a deputationists in employment of WAPDA
Punjab was Province of permanent residence of civil servant and he was allocated to that Province and as such he would be deemed to be civil servant of Punjab Province at the time of his recruitment and in WAPDA's employment only as a deputationists
Civil servant who was removed from service by WAPDA Authority, stood reverted to Province of Punjab and could report to Government of Punjab and would have option to pursue his remedy against his removal before Punjab Service Tribunal as a civil servant of Punjab Government
Federal Service Tribunal, had no jurisdiction to decide his appeal
Appeal filed by civil servant against his removal from service before Federal Service Tribunal, not being maintainable was dismissed in circumstances. Jahanzeb Khan v. WAPDA through its Chairman 1981 SCMR 1178 ref.
Judgment & Decree
Appeal No. 239(L) of 1984, decided on 3rd October, 1991. Civil service
Civil servant, who originally joined Electricity Department of the then West Pakistan Government in 1957 on work-charged basis, came to WAPDA in same capacity in consequence of en bloc transfer of employees of Provincial Electricity Department in 1959
WAPDA Authority, could not produce definite order with regard to absorption of civil servant in WAPDA
In absence of such order which could show fresh appointment of civil servant in WAPDA, civil servant would be deemed to have continued his service in WAPDA as a deputationists in employment of WAPDA
Punjab was Province of permanent residence of civil servant and he was allocated to that Province and as such he would be deemed to be civil servant of Punjab Province at the time of his recruitment and in WAPDA's employment only as a deputationists
Civil servant who was removed from service by WAPDA Authority, stood reverted to Province of Punjab and could report to Government of Punjab and would have option to pursue his remedy against his removal before Punjab Service Tribunal as a civil servant of Punjab Government
Federal Service Tribunal, had no jurisdiction to decide his appeal
Appeal filed by civil servant against his removal from service before Federal Service Tribunal, not being maintainable was dismissed in circumstances. Jahanzeb Khan v. WAPDA through its Chairman 1981 SCMR 1178 ref. Syed Jamshed Ali for Appellant. Ch. Ghulam Hassan Gulshan for Respondent. Date of hearing: 29th August, 1991.