1990 PLP 337 (SCMR)
THE LAHORE DIOCESAN TRUST ASSOCIATION‑‑Petitioner Versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB and 6 others‑‑Respondents
| Citation | 1990 PLP 337 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Afzal Zullah and Usman Ali Shah, JJ |
| Parties | THE LAHORE DIOCESAN TRUST ASSOCIATION‑‑Petitioner Versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB and 6 others‑‑Respondents |
| Primary Law | Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1990 PLP 337 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1990 PLP 337 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Muhammad Afzal Zullah and Usman Ali Shah, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1990 PLP 337 (SCMR) (THE LAHORE DIOCESAN TRUST ASSOCIATION‑‑Petitioner Versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB and 6 others‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Mushtaq Raj, Advocate Supreme Court and Ch. Mehdi Khan Mehtab, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
- Nemo for Respondents.
- Date of hearing: 10th June, 1989.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the order dated, 25‑1‑1986 of the Lahore High Court in Civil Petition No. 102 of 1986). ' ‑‑‑OXXXIX, Rr.l & 2‑‑‑Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.185(3)‑‑‑Ad interim injunction‑‑‑Petitioner making prayer that Revenue Authorities should not make any changes in the Revenue Record till decision of civil suit‑‑‑Petition was dismissed with the direction that the changes should not adversely affect any right or interest of the petitioner in any manner whatsoever.
Judgment & Decree
MUHAMMAD AFZAL ZULLAH, J.‑‑Leave to appeal has been sought by a plaintiff in a suit for declaration: against the dismissal by the high Court, of a Civil Revision which had arisen out of the dismissal by the trial Court, of petitioner's application for an ad interim injunction. The petitioner has failed throughout on the question of stay. After hearing the learned counsel, at some length, with regard to the facts and findings and on the merits of the case, we do not consider it a fit case fur grant of leave to appeal so as to interfere with the discretionary orders passed with regard to interim relief. The prayer made is that the Revenue Authorities should not make any changes in the Revenue record till the decision of the civil suit. In the circumstances of this case if any changes are made they shall remain subject to the final decision in the civil suit. An apprehension is expressed by learned counsel that though ordinarily such changes in record do not affect the rights of the parties but in this case the petitioner's interest would be prejudiced if change is made in the Revenue record. After hearing him on this question we direct that whatever the changes, they shall not adversely affect any right or interest of the petitioner in any manner whatsoever. With the foregoing observations this leave to appeal petition is dismissed. M.A.K./L‑34/S Petition dismissed.