PCRLJ 2006

2006 P Cr (PLP)

Mst. SHAHEENA NARGIS — Petitioner Versus DISTRICT POLICE OFFICER, BAHAWALNAGAR and another — Respondents

Jurisdiction / Court
Lahore
Decided Date
2005-September-9
Honorable Judges
N/A
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 2006 P Cr (PLP)
Forum / Court Lahore
Bench Members N/A
Parties Mst. SHAHEENA NARGIS — Petitioner Versus DISTRICT POLICE OFFICER, BAHAWALNAGAR and another — Respondents
Primary Law Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2006 P Cr (PLP)?

This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2006 P Cr (PLP)?

The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: N/A.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 2006 P Cr (PLP) (Mst. SHAHEENA NARGIS — Petitioner Versus DISTRICT POLICE OFFICER, BAHAWALNAGAR and another — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

Representation

  • ----S. 491---Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Ss.11-EEE & 25---Habeas Corpus petition---Petitioner in her petition under S.491, Cr.P.C. had challenged arrest and detention of her husband caused by District Police Officer under orders of Home Secretary to Government under S.11-EEE of Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997---Police Officer concerned had not produced any record showing involvement of alleged detenu in any case and he also could not produce Notification containing name of alleged detenu in a list in Fourth Schedule as envisaged under S.11-EEE of Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997, whereunder detention of a person could only be made if his name was included in the list referred to in the said section---Deputy Superintendent of Police (Legal) and Assistant Advocate-General both having failed to produce that list, detention order passed by Home Secretary, was illegal and without lawful authority---Detenu was ordered to be released, in circumstances.
  • Khan Muhammad Hussain Azad for Petitioner.

Headnotes / Summary

S. 491

Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Ss.11-EEE & 25

Habeas Corpus petition

Petitioner in her petition under S.491, Cr.P.C. had challenged arrest and detention of her husband caused by District Police Officer under orders of Home Secretary to Government under S.11-EEE of Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997

Police Officer concerned had not produced any record showing involvement of alleged detenu in any case and he also could not produce Notification containing name of alleged detenu in a list in Fourth Schedule as envisaged under S.11-EEE of Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997, whereunder detention of a person could only be made if his name was included in the list referred to in the said section

Deputy Superintendent of Police (Legal) and Assistant Advocate-General both having failed to produce that list, detention order passed by Home Secretary, was illegal and without lawful authority

Detenu was ordered to be released, in circumstances.

Judgment & Decree

M.A. SHAHID SIDDIQUI, J.

Through this petition under section 491, Cr.P.C. Mst. Shaheena Nargis petitioner has challenged the arrest and detention of her husband Muhammad Zafar Iqbal son of Allah Ditta in District Jail, Bahawalnagar caused by the District Police Officer, Bahawalnagar under the orders of the Secretary to the Government of the Punjab, Home Department, dated 30th July, 2005 -under section 11-EEE Of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997. The petitioner previously instituted Writ Petition No.2893 of 2005 which came up for hearing on 31-8-2005 before my learned brother Muhammad Jehangir Arshad, J. who after hearing parties and examining the record came to the conclusion that there was no justification in the detention orders. However, he was pleased to refer the matter to the Secretary, Government of Punjab, Law Department, with a direction to place the matter before the competent authority to see the feasibility of conferring powers of hearing and deciding representation in such-like matters by some independent authority other than the one who has passed the detention order.

2. The learned A.A.-G. was directed to seek instruction from the District Police Officer, Bahawalnagar and produce the entire previous record of the alleged detenu. Ghularn Ahmad, D.S.P. Legal, Bahawalnagar has placed a report of the Incharge Security Branch, office of District Police Officer, Bahawalnagar. According to which Muhammad Zafar Iqbal, the alleged detenu, who was General Secretary, Tehreek-e-Fiqa-e-Jaffaria, Bahawalnagar, had been detained under section 11-EEE of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997 for three months. He has not produced any record showing involvement of the alleged detenu in any case. He has also not been able to produce the notification containing the name of the alleged detenu in a list entered in the Fourth Schedule as envisaged under section 11-EE of the said Act. A plain reading of section 11-EEE of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997 clearly shows that an order of detention of a person under this section can only be made if his name is included in the list referred to in section 11-EE of the said Act. The learned A.A.-G. and the D.S.P. Legal, Bahawalnagar, A both, have failed to produce that list, therefore, the detention order passed by the Home Secretary, Government of Punjab. is illegal and without lawful authority. Section 25 of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997 is the only provision which provides an appeal against the final judgment of Anti-Terrorism Court. The Act does not contain any provision providing appeal or representation against a detention order. In these circumstances of the case, the detention of Muhammad Zafar Iqbal the husband of the petitioner is held to be illegal. He is ordered to be released forthwith if not required in any case. H.B.T. /S-476/L Petition allowed.