1989 PLC 483 (PLP)
MASEEHUDDIN SIDDIQUI Versus SIND LABOUR COURT NO. V and others
| Citation | 1989 PLC 483 (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi high Court |
| Bench Members | Saeeduzzaman Siddiqui, J |
| Parties | MASEEHUDDIN SIDDIQUI Versus SIND LABOUR COURT NO. V and others |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1989 PLC 483 (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1989 PLC 483 (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi high Court bench comprising: Saeeduzzaman Siddiqui, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1989 PLC 483 (PLP) (MASEEHUDDIN SIDDIQUI Versus SIND LABOUR COURT NO. V and others). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Obaidur Rehman for Petitioner.
- Nemo for Respondent No. 1.
- Barkat Ahmad, Assistant Director, Labour for Respondent No. 2.
- Syed Saeed Hassan for Respondent No. 3.
- Fazle Ghani Khan for Respondent No. 4.
- This case is fixed only for hearing of miscellaneous application but with the consent of parties' Advocate I have taken up the main petition. The real contest in the case is between the petitioner and respondent No. 3 while respondents 1 and 2 or officials who have passed orders in the case and respondent No. 4 is the management The learned counsel for the petitioner and respondent No. 3 now agree that election to the posts of office-bearers of P fizer Employees Trade Union may be held under the supervision of respondent No. 2 whose representative is present in Court. They also agree that the elected office- bearers will take over their office from the date of such election and shall be entitled to exercise their rights under the Constitution of the Union as and from the date of such assumption of their office. The learned counsel for respondent No. 4 neither opposes nor accepts this arrangement between the petitioner and respondent No. 3 but requests' that it may be clarified that all the existing agreements between the management and union will be binding on the incumbents of the Union office. The representative of respondent No. 2 present in Court states that on the basis of above agreement between petitioner and respondent No.3 he can arrange holding of election within 15 days, in accordance with the terms of the Constitution of Union. I accordingly by consent of the counsel for the petitioner and respondent No. 3 and the representative of respondent No. 2 direct that election to the posts of office-bearers of Trade Union namely Pfizer Laboratories Employees Union be held within a period of 15 days from today under the supervision of respondent No. 2. The petition is disposed of with no order as to costs. As a result of disposal of maim petition the injunction application also stands disposed of. It is, however, clarified by consent for the petitioner as well as respondent No. 3 that any entered into between previous office-bearers of Union and the management shall be binding on the newly-elected office-bearers of Union in accordance with the law. The main petition is disposed of in terms of the above consent order. As a result of disposal of main petition, the miscellaneous application is also disposed of accordingly.
Headnotes / Summary
Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII 1969)
S. 8(7)--Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 199--Elections of office-bearers of trade union--Dispute relating to--Parties to Constitutional petition agreed that elections of office-bearers be held under supervision of Registrar and elected office-bearers to take over their office from the date of such election and would be entitled to exercise their rights under the Constitution of the union as and from the date of such assumption of their office--High Court disposed of Constitutional petition in terms of compromise with the direction that any agreement entered into between previous office-bearers of union and management would be binding on newly-elected office-bearers of union, in accordance with law.
Judgment & Decree
Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII 1969)
S. 8(7)--Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 199--Elections of office-bearers of trade union--Dispute relating to--Parties to Constitutional petition agreed that elections of office-bearers be held under supervision of Registrar and elected office-bearers to take over their office from the date of such election and would be entitled to exercise their rights under the Constitution of the union as and from the date of such assumption of their office--High Court disposed of Constitutional petition in terms of compromise with the direction that any agreement entered into between previous office-bearers of union and management would be binding on newly-elected office-bearers of union, in accordance with law. Obaidur Rehman for Petitioner. Nemo for Respondent No. 1. Barkat Ahmad, Assistant Director, Labour for Respondent No. 2. Syed Saeed Hassan for Respondent No. 3. Fazle Ghani Khan for Respondent No. 4. This case is fixed only for hearing of miscellaneous application but with the consent of parties' Advocate I have taken up the main petition. The real contest in the case is between the petitioner and respondent No. 3 while respondents 1 and 2 or officials who have passed orders in the case and respondent No. 4 is the management The learned counsel for the petitioner and respondent No. 3 now agree that election to the posts of office-bearers of P fizer Employees Trade Union may be held under the supervision of respondent No. 2 whose representative is present in Court. They also agree that the elected office- bearers will take over their office from the date of such election and shall be entitled to exercise their rights under the Constitution of the Union as and from the date of such assumption of their office. The learned counsel for respondent No. 4 neither opposes nor accepts this arrangement between the petitioner and respondent No. 3 but requests' that it may be clarified that all the existing agreements between the management and union will be binding on the incumbents of the Union office. The representative of respondent No. 2 present in Court states that on the basis of above agreement between petitioner and respondent No.3 he can arrange holding of election within 15 days, in accordance with the terms of the Constitution of Union. I accordingly by consent of the counsel for the petitioner and respondent No. 3 and the representative of respondent No. 2 direct that election to the posts of office-bearers of Trade Union namely Pfizer Laboratories Employees Union be held within a period of 15 days from today under the supervision of respondent No. 2. The petition is disposed of with no order as to costs. As a result of disposal of maim petition the injunction application also stands disposed of. It is, however, clarified by consent for the petitioner as well as respondent No. 3 that any entered into between previous office-bearers of Union and the management shall be binding on the newly-elected office-bearers of Union in accordance with the law. The main petition is disposed of in terms of the above consent order. As a result of disposal of main petition, the miscellaneous application is also disposed of accordingly. A.A./M-665/K Order accordingly.