PCRLJN 2021

2021 P Cr (PLP)

Mst. NASREEN BIBI — Petitioner Versus The STATE and others — Respondents

Jurisdiction / Court
Lahore (Multan Bench)
Decided Date
2020-January-28
Honorable Judges
N/A
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 2021 P Cr (PLP)
Forum / Court Lahore (Multan Bench)
Bench Members N/A
Parties Mst. NASREEN BIBI — Petitioner Versus The STATE and others — Respondents
Primary Law (b) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), (a) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2021 P Cr (PLP)?

This judgment primarily cites: (b) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), (a) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2021 P Cr (PLP)?

The case was heard and decided by the Lahore (Multan Bench) bench comprising: N/A.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 2021 P Cr (PLP) (Mst. NASREEN BIBI — Petitioner Versus The STATE and others — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

(b) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) (a) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

Representation

  • Muhammad Ali Khan Baloch for Petitioner.

Headnotes / Summary

S. 497

Control of Narcotic Substances Act (XXV of 1997), S. 9(c)

Possession of narcotics

Bail, grant of

Infant detained in jail along with mother (accused)

Completion of investigation

Non-availability of report of Chemical Examiner

Effect

Accused lady was alleged to have been found in possession of 1400 grams of charas

Contention of accused was that an infant aged about 2 months was being detained in the jail along with her

Held; welfare of suckling child demanded that child should not be made to suffer in jail for the offence allegedly committed by his/her mother

Grant of bail did not amount to acquittal of the accused as the custody of accused was shifted from jail lock-up to the hands of sureties, who were made responsible to produce the accused before the court as and when required

Investigation had already been completed

Prosecution had not received the report of Chemical Examiner confirming the fact that contraband allegedly recovered from possession of the accused was in fact charas

Accused had never been previously involved in any criminal cases

Petition for grant of bail was allowed, in circumstances.

S. 497

Bail

Principle

Scope

Grant of bail does not amount to acquittal of the accused as the custody of accused is shifted from jail lock-up to the hands of sureties, who are made responsible to produce the accused before the court as and when required.

Judgment & Decree

MUHAMMAD WAHEED KHAN, J.

Through this petition, the petitioner seeks post-arrest bail in case FIR No.43/2020 dated 14.01.2020 registered under section 9(c) of the Control of Narcotic Substances Act, 1997 at Police Station Multan Cantt., Multan.

2. The brief allegation against the petitioner as per contents of FIR is that on 13.01.2020 at about 11:50 p.m., she was apprehended by the local police on suspicion and Chars weighing 1400-gms, wrapped in a shopper bag, was recovered from her possession.

3. Heard. Record perused.

4. The crux of arguments of learned counsel for the petitioner is that an infant aged about 2-1/2 months is being detained in the jail along with the petitioner (the mother) and this factum was confirmed from the police file vide zimni No.1 dated 14.01.2020. Welfare of suckling child so demands that child should not be made to suffer in jail for the offence allegedly committed by his/her mother. Reliance in this regard may be placed in the case of Mst. Nusrat v. The State (1996 SCMR 973), wherein august Supreme Court has observed that concept of "welfare of minor was incompatible with jail life. Instead of detaining the innocent child/infant in the jail for the crime allegedly committed by his mother, it was in the interest of justice as well as welfare of minor if the mother was released from jail. In another judgment rendered by this Court reported in case of Mst. Nasreen v. State (1998 MLD 1350), the bail was granted on the ground that a suckling child should not be made to suffer in jail. In another judgment passed by this Court in case of Mst. Zubaida Bibi v. The State (PLD 2005 Lahore 352), it is held that as the baby could not be separated from her accused mother and the child should not be punished in any manner and presence of baby in jail would amount to punishment and under the circumstances the mother was admitted to bail. In a recent judgment passed by the Hon'ble Peshawar High Court in case of Mst. Nazima Bibi v. The State and another (PLD 2018 Peshawar 138), the Hon'ble High Court while granting bail to mother observed that the accused/petitioner deserves to be released on bail on this score alone that she is also having a suckling baby with her in the jail premises. Furthermore, the grant of bail does not amount to acquittal of the accused as the custody of accused is shifted from jail lock-up to the hands of sureties, who are made responsible to produce the accused before the Court as and when required. Even otherwise, the investigation has already been completed and the report under section 173, Cr.P.C. has been submitted before the learned Trial Court on 16.01.2020 and there is no progress in the trial. Even the prosecution has not received the report of Chemical Examiner confirming the fact that contraband allegedly recovered from possession of the petitioner was in fact Chars. It is apprised to the Court that petitioner is previously not involved in any criminal case.

5. Under the circumstances, this petition is allowed, and the petitioner is admitted to post-arrest bail, subject to her furnishing bail bond in the sum of Rs.2,00,000/- (Rupees two lacs) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court. SA/N-16/L Bail granted.